Literature DB >> 16111940

Implicitly evoked actions modulate visual selection: evidence from parietal extinction.

Giuseppe di Pellegrino1, Robert Rafal, Steven P Tipper.   

Abstract

It has been proposed that the mental representation of a graspable object involves not only a description of its visual properties but also encodings of the motor programs to act upon it. Thus, observing a handle automatically primes the motor programs responsible for reaching and grasping it. Here, we provide neurological evidence that such action-related object features can bias visual selection. Two patients with visual extinction after right-parietal injury detected cups with left- or right-oriented handles, briefly displayed in either or both visual fields. People with this disorder have deficient awareness for stimuli toward the contralesional, left side of space, especially when competing stimuli appear further to the right. This contralesional extinction was significantly reduced when cups had handles affording a left-hand grasp, even though no hand response was required. No effect was found when handles were replaced with patches equated for position, size, and mean luminance. These data suggest that action-related information may be correctly extracted by the visual system, even though they are unavailable for conscious report. It is proposed that an object affordance for grasping modulates attentional selection by activating specific motor schema that, in turn, enhance the competitive strength of that object representation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16111940     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  14 in total

1.  Prism adaptation reverses the local processing bias in patients with right temporo-parietal junction lesions.

Authors:  Janet H Bultitude; Robert D Rafal; Alexandra List
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Episodic memory for spatial context biases spatial attention.

Authors:  Elisa Ciaramelli; Olivia Lin; Morris Moscovitch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The role of perceptual load in action affordance by ignored objects.

Authors:  Sandra Murphy; José van Velzen; Jan W de Fockert
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

4.  Motor and Visuospatial Attention and Motor Planning After Stroke: Considerations for the Rehabilitation of Standing Balance and Gait.

Authors:  Sue Peters; Todd C Handy; Bimal Lakhani; Lara A Boyd; S Jayne Garland
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2015-04-30

5.  Visual and linguistic cues to graspable objects.

Authors:  Andriy Myachykov; Rob Ellis; Angelo Cangelosi; Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Response requirements modulate tactile spatial congruency effects.

Authors:  Alberto Gallace; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Polly Dalton; Bas Kreukniet; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Abnormal dynamics of activation of object use information in apraxia: evidence from eyetracking.

Authors:  Chia-Iin Lee; Daniel Mirman; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Effector- and target-independent representation of observed actions: evidence from incidental repetition priming.

Authors:  Marcello Costantini; Giorgia Committeri; Gaspare Galati
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  From observation to action simulation: the role of attention, eye-gaze, emotion, and body state.

Authors:  Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  Action intentions modulate allocation of visual attention: electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Agnieszka Wykowska; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-10-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.