Literature DB >> 23820977

Visual and linguistic cues to graspable objects.

Andriy Myachykov1, Rob Ellis, Angelo Cangelosi, Martin H Fischer.   

Abstract

Two experiments investigated (1) how activation of manual affordances is triggered by visual and linguistic cues to manipulable objects and (2) whether graspable object parts play a special role in this process. Participants pressed a key to categorize manipulable target objects copresented with manipulable distractor objects on a computer screen. Three factors were varied in Experiment 1: (1) the target's and (2) the distractor's handles' orientation congruency with the lateral manual response and (3) the Visual Focus on one of the objects. In Experiment 2, a linguistic cue factor was added to these three factors-participants heard the name of one of the two objects prior to the target display onset. Analysis of participants' motor and oculomotor behaviour confirmed that perceptual and linguistic cues potentiated activation of grasp affordances. Both target- and distractor-related affordance effects were modulated by the presence of visual and linguistic cues. However, a differential visual attention mechanism subserved activation of compatibility effects associated with target and distractor objects. We also registered an independent implicit attention attraction effect from objects' handles, suggesting that graspable parts automatically attract attention during object viewing. This effect was further amplified by visual but not linguistic cues, thus providing initial evidence for a recent hypothesis about differential roles of visual and linguistic information in potentiating stable and variable affordances (Borghi in Language and action in cognitive neuroscience. Psychology Press, London, 2012).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23820977     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3616-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  46 in total

1.  Micro-affordance: the potentiation of components of action by seen objects.

Authors:  R Ellis; M Tucker
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2000-11

2.  Semantics affect the planning but not control of grasping.

Authors:  Scott Glover; Peter Dixon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The time course of visuo-motor affordances.

Authors:  Martin H Fischer; Christoph D Dahl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Vision-for-action: the effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects.

Authors:  Steven P Tipper; Matthew A Paul; Amy E Hayes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-06

5.  An attentional mechanism for selecting appropriate actions afforded by graspable objects.

Authors:  Daniel Loach; Alexandra Frischen; Neil Bruce; John K Tsotsos
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-12

6.  When motor attention improves selective attention: the dissociating role of saliency.

Authors:  Ed Symes; Giovanni Ottoboni; Mike Tucker; Rob Ellis; Alessia Tessari
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  A classification of hand preference by association analysis.

Authors:  M Annett
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1970-08

8.  Destination compatibility, affordances, and coding rules: a reply to Proctor, Van Zandt, Lu, and Weeks.

Authors:  C F Michaels
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  When objects are close to me: affordances in the peripersonal space.

Authors:  Marcello Costantini; Ettore Ambrosini; Claudia Scorolli; Anna M Borghi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-04

10.  Attention modulates motor system activation during action observation: evidence for inhibitory rebound.

Authors:  Stefanie Schuch; Andrew P Bayliss; Christoph Klein; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  13 in total

1.  How do you hold your mouse? Tracking the compatibility effect between hand posture and stimulus size.

Authors:  Andrea Flumini; Laura Barca; Anna M Borghi; Giovanni Pezzulo
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-10-28

2.  Anticipatory eye fixations reveal tool knowledge for tool interaction.

Authors:  Anna Belardinelli; Marissa Barabas; Marc Himmelbach; Martin V Butz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The role of executive control in the activation of manual affordances.

Authors:  Nikolay Dagaev; Yury Shtyrov; Andriy Myachykov
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-09-21

4.  Critical bottom-up attentional factors in the handle orientation effect: asymmetric luminance transients and object-center eccentricity relative to fixation.

Authors:  Kiril Kostov; Armina Janyan
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-04-04

5.  Priming tool actions: Are real objects more effective primes than pictures?

Authors:  Scott D Squires; Scott N Macdonald; Jody C Culham; Jacqueline C Snow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Grammar, Gender and Demonstratives in Lateralized Imagery for Sentences.

Authors:  Mikkel Wallentin; Roberta Rocca; Sofia Stroustrup
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2019-08

7.  The visual encoding of graspable unfamiliar objects.

Authors:  Giovanni Federico; François Osiurak; Maria Antonella Brandimonte; Marco Salvatore; Carlo Cavaliere
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-03-23

8.  Apraxia of tool use is not a matter of affordances.

Authors:  François Osiurak
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Tool heads prime saccades.

Authors:  Artur Pilacinski; Stella De Haan; Rita Donato; Jorge Almeida
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Stable and variable affordances are both automatic and flexible.

Authors:  Anna M Borghi; Lucia Riggio
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.