Literature DB >> 18762930

Episodic memory for spatial context biases spatial attention.

Elisa Ciaramelli1, Olivia Lin, Morris Moscovitch.   

Abstract

The study explores the bottom-up attentional consequences of episodic memory retrieval. Individuals studied words (Experiment 1) or pictures (Experiment 2) presented on the left or on the right of the screen. They then viewed studied and new stimuli in the centre of the screen. One-second after the appearance of each stimulus, participants had to respond to a dot presented on the left or on the right of the screen. The dot could follow a stimulus that had been presented, during the study phase, on the same side as the dot (congruent condition), a stimulus that had been presented on the opposite side (incongruent condition), or a new stimulus (neutral condition). Subjects were faster to respond to the dot in the congruent compared to the incongruent condition, with an overall right visual field advantage in Experiment 1. The memory-driven facilitation effect correlated with subjects' re-experiencing of the encoding context (R responses; Experiment 1), but not with their explicit memory for the side of items' presentation (source memory; Experiment 2). The results indicate that memory contents are attended automatically and can bias the deployment of attention. The degree to which memory and attention interact appears related to subjective but not objective indicators of memory strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18762930     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1548-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  43 in total

Review 1.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Computational constraints between retrieving the past and predicting the future, and the CA3-CA1 differentiation.

Authors:  Alessandro Treves
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.899

3.  Divided attention during retrieval suppresses false recognition in confabulation.

Authors:  Elisa Ciaramelli; Simona Ghetti; Marco Borsotti
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory.

Authors:  F I Craik; R Govoni; M Naveh-Benjamin; N D Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1996-06

5.  Spatial distribution of the inhibitory effect of peripheral non-informative cues on simple reaction time to non-fixated visual targets.

Authors:  G Berlucchi; G Tassinari; C A Marzi; M Di Stefano
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Opposite superiorities of the right and left cerebral hemispheres in discriminative reaction time to physiognomical and alphabetical material.

Authors:  G Rizzolatti; C Umiltà; G Berlucchi
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 7.  Afferent and efferent models of visual perceptual asymmetries: theoretical and empirical implications.

Authors:  M Moscovitch
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

Review 9.  Top-down and bottom-up attention to memory: a hypothesis (AtoM) on the role of the posterior parietal cortex in memory retrieval.

Authors:  Elisa Ciaramelli; Cheryl L Grady; Morris Moscovitch
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 10.  Role of parietal regions in episodic memory retrieval: the dual attentional processes hypothesis.

Authors:  Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  3 in total

1.  Long-term memory prepares neural activity for perception.

Authors:  Mark G Stokes; Kathryn Atherton; Eva Zita Patai; Anna Christina Nobre
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  True memory, false memory, and subjective recollection deficits after focal parietal lobe lesions.

Authors:  David B Drowos; Marian Berryhill; Jessica M André; Ingrid R Olson
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Hemispatial Neglect Shows That "Before" Is "Left".

Authors:  Mario Bonato; Arnaud Saj; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2016-05-29       Impact factor: 3.599

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.