Literature DB >> 18437368

Effector- and target-independent representation of observed actions: evidence from incidental repetition priming.

Marcello Costantini1, Giorgia Committeri, Gaspare Galati.   

Abstract

Simulation mechanisms are thought to play an important role in action recognition. On this view, actions are represented through the re-enactment of the observed action. Mirror neurons are thought to be the neuronal counterpart of such a process, and code actions at a rather abstract level, often generalizing across sensory modalities and effectors. In humans, attention has been focussed on the somatotopic, effector dependent representation of observed actions in the mirror system. In this series of behavioural studies, we used incidental repetition priming to determine to which degree the cognitive representation of observed actions relies on effector- and target-dependent representations. Participants were presented with images depicting meaningless or meaningful actions and pressed a button only when presented with a meaningful action. Images were classified as depicting a repeated or new action, relative to the previous image in the trial series. In the first experiment, we demonstrate a priming effect based on the repetition of an action, performed by the same effector over the same target object. In the second experiment, we demonstrate that this facilitation holds even when the same action is performed over a different target object. Finally, in the third experiment we show that the action priming effect holds even when the same action is accomplished with different effectors. These results suggest the existence of a cognitive representation of actions, automatically activated during observation, which is abstract enough to generalize across different targets for that action and different effectors performing that action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18437368     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1369-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  56 in total

1.  The Brain's concepts: the role of the Sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge.

Authors:  Vittorio Gallese; George Lakoff
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits.

Authors:  Marco Tettamanti; Giovanni Buccino; Maria Cristina Saccuman; Vittorio Gallese; Massimo Danna; Paola Scifo; Ferruccio Fazio; Giacomo Rizzolatti; Stefano F Cappa; Daniela Perani
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Conceptual representations of action in the lateral temporal cortex.

Authors:  Joseph W Kable; Irene P Kan; Ashley Wilson; Sharon L Thompson-Schill; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The role of immediate and final goals in action planning: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Jasminka Majdandzić; Meike J Grol; Hein T van Schie; Lennart Verhagen; Ivan Toni; Harold Bekkering
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Building a motor simulation de novo: observation of dance by dancers.

Authors:  Emily S Cross; Antonia F de C Hamilton; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  Simulation trouble.

Authors:  Shaun Gallagher
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.083

7.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence.

Authors:  R De Jong; C C Liang; E Lauber
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Objects, parts, and categories.

Authors:  B Tversky; K Hemenway
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1984-06

Review 9.  Functional neuroimaging studies of encoding, priming, and explicit memory retrieval.

Authors:  R L Buckner; W Koutstaal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Sensorimotor learning configures the human mirror system.

Authors:  Caroline Catmur; Vincent Walsh; Cecilia Heyes
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  9 in total

1.  Incidental action observation modulates muscle activity.

Authors:  Sukhvinder S Obhi; Jeremy Hogeveen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Swallowing intentional off-state in aging and Alzheimer's disease: preliminary study.

Authors:  Ianessa A Humbert; Donald G McLaren; Georgia Malandraki; Sterling C Johnson; Joanne Robbins
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 4.472

3.  Activity in superior parietal cortex during training by observation predicts asymmetric learning levels across hands.

Authors:  Ori Ossmy; Roy Mukamel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Tuning of ventral premotor cortex neurons to distinct observed grasp types: a TMS-priming study.

Authors:  Luigi Cattaneo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Press to grasp: how action dynamics shape object categorization.

Authors:  Stefano Triberti; Claudia Repetto; Marcello Costantini; Giuseppe Riva; Corrado Sinigaglia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  When far becomes near: shared environments activate action simulation.

Authors:  Debra Griffiths; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Priming of reach trajectory when observing actions: hand-centred effects.

Authors:  Debra Griffiths; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  The role of attention in human motor resonance.

Authors:  Guglielmo Puglisi; Antonella Leonetti; Ayelet Landau; Luca Fornia; Gabriella Cerri; Paola Borroni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Neural dynamics of grip and goal integration during the processing of others' actions with objects: An ERP study.

Authors:  Jérémy Decroix; Clémence Roger; Solène Kalénine
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.