| Literature DB >> 16107221 |
Tomoko Tani1, Kazuaki Tanabe, Minako Tani, Fumie Ono, Minako Katayama, Koichi Tamita, Shuichiro Kaji, Atsushi Yamamuro, Kunihiko Nagai, Kenichi Shiratori, Shigefumi Morioka, Yasuki Kihara.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Myocardial contrast echocardiography and coronary flow velocity pattern with a rapid diastolic deceleration time after percutaneous coronary intervention has been reported to be useful in assessing microvascular damage in patients with acute myocardial infarction. AIM: To evaluate myocardial contrast echocardiography with harmonic power Doppler imaging, coronary flow velocity reserve and coronary artery flow pattern in predicting functional recovery by using transthoracic echocardiography.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2005 PMID: 16107221 PMCID: PMC1201156 DOI: 10.1186/1476-7120-3-22
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound ISSN: 1476-7120 Impact factor: 2.062
Figure 1Quantitative analysis of harmonic power Doppler imaging. A. Four different regions of interest are drawn on the digital clip. The ROI can be individually repositioned in each frame to match the anatomy. B. The graph shows time-intensity curves of the mean Doppler information (dB) from the ROIs. y1 = basal septum, y2 = mid septum, y3 = apex, y4 = apical portion of lateral segment.
Figure 2Measurement of parameters from systolic and diastolic flow velocity patterns. By tracing the contour the coronary flow velocity wave form, we measured the peak diastolic velocity (PDV: cm/sec), mean diastolic velocity (MDV: cm/sec), peak systolic velocity (PSV: cm/sec) and deceleration time of diastolic flow velocity (DDT: msec).
Patient Characteristics
| Group A | Group B | |
| Number | 20 | 10 |
| Age | 63 ± 12 | 64 ± 10 |
| Men (%) | 17 (85%) | 8 (80%) |
| Cardiovascular risk factors | ||
| Diabetes Mellitus | 7 | 4 |
| Hypertension | 11 | 6 |
| Smoking | 12 | 7 |
| Total Cholesterol (mg/dl) | 200 ± 38 | 189 ± 13 |
| HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl) | 43 ± 8 | 48 ± 12 |
| Triglyceride (mg/dl) | 155 ± 94 | 105 ± 44 |
| Visible Collaterals to Infarct-related artery | 5/20 | 3/10 |
| Referece Diameter (mm) | 3.4 ± 0.7 | 3.1 ± 0.5 |
| TIMI 3 flow after PCI | 18/20 | 5/10* |
*p < 0.01
PCI: Percutaneous Coronary Interventional Therapy
TIMI: Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction
Figure 3Representative coronary flow pattern in Group A (A) and Group B (B).
Figure 4The results of MCE and CFR in a patient with Group A. 1) HPDI showing increase in contrast signals in the anteroseptal and apical lesion in 4-chamber view during ATP stress image (B) when compared with baseline image (A). 2) PDV in the infarct-related artery increased during ATP stress (D) compared with baseline (C) by TTDE.
Figure 5The results of MCE and CFR in a patient with Group B. 1) HPDI showing resting apical perfusion defect (A) and without improvement of perfusion during ATP stress (B) in the anteroseptal and apical lesion. 2) PDV in the infarct-related artery slightly increased during ATP stress (D) compared with baseline (C) by TTDE
Differences of Parameters between Two Groups
| Group A | Group B | |
| PIR at rest | 0.668 ± 0.178 | 0.248 ± 0.015# |
| PIR at ATP stress | 0.725 ± 0.194 | 0.295 ± 0.107# |
| EDV in the acute phase (ml) | 112 ± 33 | 146 ± 38 |
| EDV at follow-up (ml) | 114 ± 30 | 192 ± 39* |
| EF in the acute phase (%) | 50 ± 7 | 45 ± 9 |
| EF at follow-up (%) | 52 ± 7 | 39 ± 9* |
| LVWMI in the acute phase | 2.1 ± 0.7 | 2.4 ± 0.3 |
| LVWMI at follow-up | 1.7 ± 0.4 | 2.4 ± 0.3* |
| Peak creatine kinase (U/L) | 2734 ± 868 | 6198 ± 2265* |
| CFR | 2.60 ± 0.8 | 1.31 ± 0.29* |
#p < 0.05, *p < 0.01
PIR, peak intensity ratio; EDV, end-diastolic volume; EF, ejection fraction; CFR, coronary blood flow reserve; LVWMI, left ventricular wall motion index
Differences of Parameters between Two Groups
| Group 1 | Group 2 | p | |
| PIR at rest | 0.700 ± 0.161 | 0.334 ± 0.162 | 0.0001 |
| PIR at ATP stress | 0.736 ± 0.151 | 0.358 ± 0.057 | 0.0007 |
| Peak creatine kinase (U/L) | 1526 ± 1021 | 3724 ± 684 | 0.02 |
| DDT | 997 ± 161 | 427 ± 350 | 0.0003 |
| CFR | 2.35 ± 0.50 | 1.71 ± 0.72 | 0.03 |
Group 1: LV remodeling(-)
Group 2: LV remodeling(+)
Figure 6The result of receiver operating characteristics curve about DDT and CFR to predict wall motion recovery.