| Literature DB >> 21619676 |
Egle Sadauskiene1, Diana Zakarkaite, Ligita Ryliskyte, Jelena Celutkiene, Alfredas Rudys, Sigita Aidietiene, Aleksandras Laucevicius.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The study was designed to evaluate whether the preserved coronary flow reserve (CFR) 72 hours after reperfused acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is associated with less microvascular dysfunction and is predictive of left ventricular (LV) functional recovery and the final infarct size at follow-up.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21619676 PMCID: PMC3123269 DOI: 10.1186/1476-7120-9-16
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound ISSN: 1476-7120 Impact factor: 2.062
Figure 1Coronary flow by spectral Doppler. The greater component during diastole and the smaller component during systole at rest (A) and during hyperaemia (B). CFR = b/a. CFR > 2 (an example of normal CFR).
Figure 2An example of impaired CFR. Coronary flow by spectral Doppler at rest (A) and during hyperaemia (B). CFR < 1.5, estimated in the patient with absence of myocardial viability and with extensive myocardial perfusion defect.
Figure 3The ROC analysis for CFR.
Clinical and angiographic characteristics in two subgroups of the patients with preserved and impaired CFR
| Characteristics | Preserved CFR (N = 19) | Impaired CFR (N = 25) | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 50.26 (8.46) | 51.76 (10.78) | 0.620 | |
| Gender | Men | 16 (84.2%) | 22 (88.0%) | 0.525 |
| Cigarette smoking | 11 (57.9%) | 13 (52.0%) | 0.467 | |
| Hypertension | 12 (63.2%) | 17 (68.0%) | 0.492 | |
| Hypercholesterolemia | 19 (100%) | 25 (100%) | - | |
| Obesity | 5 (26.3%) | 9 (36.0%) | 0.363 | |
| ACE inhibitors | 6 (31.6%) | 5 (20.0%) | 0.298 | |
| Beta-blockers | 4 (21.1%) | 8 (32.0%) | 0.323 | |
| Aspirin | 1 (5.3%) | 3 (12.0%) | 0.415 | |
| Diuretics | 2 (10.5%) | 2 (8.0%) | 0.585 | |
| Nitrates | 0 | 1 (4.0%) | 0.568 | |
| Peak CK-MB (U/l) | 208.64 (272.20) | 428.14 (565.51) | 0.127 | |
| Peak Troponin I (μg/l) | 76.11 (102.66) | 130.00 (102.49) | 0.084 | |
| Time interval from the onset of chest pain to PCI | 0-3 hours | 12 (63.2%) | 7 (28.0%) | |
| 3-6 hours | 6 (31.6%) | 7 (28.0%) | ||
| > 6 hours | 1 (5.2%) | 11 (44.0%) | ||
| ECG ST-segment complete resolution (≥ 70%) during 1 hour after PCI | 9 (47.4%) | 4 (16.7%) | ||
| TIMI flow grade before PCI | I* | 2 (10.5%) | 1 (4.0%) | 0.396 |
| No flow | 17 (89.5%) | 24 (96.0%) | ||
| Collaterals | 6 (31.6%) | 7 (28.0%) | 0.528 | |
Data are mean (SD) or number (%) of patients.
ACE - angiotensin converting enzyme; CK - creatine kinase; PCI - percutaneous coronary intervention; ECG - electrocardiography; TIMI - Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction; LAD - left anterior descending coronary artery, AMI - acute myocardial infarction.
Correlation between CFR and parameters of LV function and perfusion
| Parameters of LV function and perfusion | |
|---|---|
| TPD at stress (%) | -0.492** |
| TPD at rest (%) | -0.541** |
| LVEF (%) (3D) | 0.267 |
| LV ESV (ml) (3D) | -0.219 |
| LV EDV (ml) (3D) | -0.314* |
| WMSI at rest | -0.295 |
| WMSI LDDE | -0.552** |
| CFR | 0.505** |
| TPD at stress (%) | -0.636** |
| TPD at rest (%) | -0.620** |
| LVEF (%) (3D) | 0.373* |
| LV ESV (ml) (3D) | -0.363* |
| LV EDV (ml) (3D) | -0.349* |
| WMSI at rest | -0.567** |
| WMSI LDDE | -0.671** |
| WMSI at rest (AMI) - WMSI at rest (at follow-up) | 0.559** |
| WMSI at rest (AMI) - WMSI LDDE (AMI) | 0.626** |
| WMSI at rest (AMI) - WMSI LDDE (at follow-up) | 0.680** |
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.001
CFR - coronary flow reserve; LV- left ventricular; LVEF - left ventricular ejection fraction; LV ESV - left ventricular end-systolic volume; LV EDV - left ventricular end-diastolic volume; 3D - three-dimensional echocardiography; WMSI - wall motion score index; WMSI LDDE - wall motion score index at low-dose dobutamine echocardiography; WMSI at rest - WMSI LDDE - difference ≥ 0.25 between WMSI at rest and WMSI at LDDE indicates the presence of contractile reserve; WMSI at rest (AMI) - WMSI at rest (at follow-up) - difference of WMSI ≥ 0.25 indicates the myocardial viability; TPD% - total perfusion defect (%)
Figure 4Correlation between CFR and parameters of LV function and perfusion. All figures presented in the manuscript are from authors personal archive.
Comparison of the parameters of LV function and perfusion in two subgroups
| Parameters of LV function recovery | Preserved CFR (N = 19) | Impaired CFR (N = 25) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| TPD at stress (%) | 19.68 (12.77) | 37.76 (11.59) | < 0.001 |
| TPD at rest (%) | 12.58 (1.22) | 30.16 (11.32) | < 0.001 |
| LVEF (%) (3D) | 47.78 (8.99) | 40.79 (7.25) | 0.007 |
| LV ESV (ml) (3D) | 64.32 (22.97) | 74.86 (16.11) | 0.084 |
| LV EDV (ml) (3D) | 109.06 (21.90) | 128.10 (24.15) | 0.011 |
| WMSI at rest | 1.74 (0.29) | 1.89 (0.17) | < 0.001 |
| WMSI LDDE | 1.48 (0.27) | 1.80 (0.22) | < 0.001 |
| CFR | 2.61 (0.40) | 2.06 (0.33) | < 0.001 |
| TPD at stress (%) | 8.74 (9.44) | 28.12 (9.72) | < 0.001 |
| TPD at rest (%) | 5.26 (6.14) | 23.28 (12.19) | < 0.001 |
| LVEF (%) (3D) | 49.78 (8.70) | 40.36 (7.90) | 0.001 |
| LV ESV (ml) (3D) | 59.28 (2.18) | 80.04 (25.10) | 0.006 |
| LV EDV (ml) (3D) | 113.39 (25.28) | 133.72 (3.59) | 0.026 |
| WMSI at rest | 1.47 (0.30) | 1.81 (0.20) | < 0.001 |
| WMSI LDDE | 1.30 (0.28) | 1.76 (0.25) | < 0.001 |
| WMSI at rest (AMI) - WMSI at rest (at follow-up) | 0.27 (0.19) | 0.07 (0.10) | < 0.001 |
| WMSI at rest (AMI) - WMSI LDDE (AMI) | 0.25 (0.13) | 0.08 (0.09) | < 0.001 |
| WMSI at rest (AMI) - WMSI LDDE (at follow-up) | 0.43 (0.20) | 0.13 (0.16) | < 0.001 |
Data are mean (SD)
CFR - coronary flow reserve; LV- left ventricular; LVEF - left ventricular ejection fraction; LV ESV - left ventricular end-systolic volume; LV EDV - left ventricular end-diastolic volume; 3D - three-dimensional echocardiography; WMSI - wall motion score index; WMSI LDDE - wall motion score index at low-dose dobutamine echocardiography; WMSI at rest - WMSI LDDE - difference ≥ 0.25 between WMSI at rest and WMSI at LDDE indicates the presence of contractile reserve; WMSI at rest (AMI) - WMSI at rest (at follow-up) - difference of WMSI ≥ 0.25 indicates the myocardial viability; TPD% - total perfusion defect (%)
The relationship between CFR, the final infarct size (TPD) and myocardial viability at follow-up
| TPD | ≤15% | Positive predictive value | Negative predictive value | Sensitivity | Specificity | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| yes | 17 | 2 | 0,89 | 0,80 | 0,77 | 0,91 | |
| no | 5 | 20 | |||||
| yes | no | ||||||
| yes | 10 | 9 | 0,52 | 0,92 | 0,83 | 0,72 | |
| no | 2 | 23 | |||||
| yes | no | ||||||
| yes | 11 | 11 | 0,50 | 0,95 | 0,92 | 0,66 | |
| no | 1 | 21 | |||||
CFR - coronary flow reserve; TPD - total perfusion defect; the difference between WMSI (at rest) during AMI and WMSI (at rest) at follow-up ≥ 0.25 indicates the myocardial viability