Literature DB >> 10880415

Assessment of myocardial perfusion by harmonic power Doppler imaging at rest and during adenosine stress: comparison with (99m)Tc-sestamibi SPECT imaging.

S K Heinle1, J Noblin, P Goree-Best, A Mello, G Ravad, S Mull, P Mammen, P A Grayburn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Harmonic power Doppler imaging (HPDI) is a novel technique for assessing myocardial perfusion by contrast echocardiography in humans. The purpose of this study was to compare myocardial perfusion by HPDI with that obtained by (99m)Tc-sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) during rest and pharmacological stress. METHODS AND
RESULTS: HPDI was performed on 123 patients who were referred for SPECT imaging for known or suspected coronary artery disease. Images were obtained at baseline and during adenosine infusion (0.14 mg. kg(-)(1). min(-)(1)x6 minutes) in 3 apical views. Myocardial perfusion by HPDI was graded for each coronary territory as absent, patchy, or full. The persistence of absent or patchy myocardial perfusion by HPDI between rest and adenosine was interpreted as a fixed defect, whereas any decrease in perfusion grade was interpreted as a reversible defect. Overall concordance between HPDI and SPECT was 83 (81%) of 103 for normal versus abnormal perfusion. Agreement between the 2 methods for each of the 3 coronary territories was 81% (kappa=0.57) for the left anterior descending artery, 76% (kappa=0.52) for the right coronary artery, and 72% (kappa=0.40) for the left circumflex artery. Discrepancies between the 2 techniques were most notable in the circumflex territory, where fixed defects were observed in 33% by HPDI but in only 14% by SPECT (chi(2)=15.8, P=0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that HPDI can reliably detect myocardial perfusion during pharmacological stress, although there was a significantly higher number of falsely abnormal results in the circumflex territory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10880415     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.102.1.55

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  25 in total

Review 1.  Stress echocardiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  W Mazur; S F Nagueh
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 2.  Contrast echocardiography.

Authors:  Michael J Stewart
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Fourier phase and amplitude analysis for automated objective evaluation of myocardial contrast echocardiograms.

Authors:  Raffi Bekeredjian; Thomas Hilbel; Arthur Filusch; Alexander Hansen; Andreas Benz; Joerg Zehelein; Helmut F Kuecherer
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion abnormalities by intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography with harmonic power Doppler imaging: comparison with positron emission tomography.

Authors:  T Muro; T Hozumi; H Watanabe; H Yamagishi; M Yoshiyama; K Takeuchi; J Yoshikawa
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Novel quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion by harmonic power Doppler imaging during myocardial contrast echocardiography.

Authors:  S Yamada; K Komuro; T Mikami; N Kudo; H Onozuka; K Goto; S Fujii; K Yamamoto; A Kitabatake
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 6.  Diagnostic and prognostic value of non-invasive imaging in known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  J D Schuijf; D Poldermans; L J Shaw; J W Jukema; H J Lamb; A de Roos; W Wijns; E E van der Wall; J J Bax
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Cardiac imaging in coronary artery disease: differing modalities.

Authors:  J D Schuijf; L J Shaw; W Wijns; H J Lamb; D Poldermans; A de Roos; E E van der Wall; J J Bax
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Detection of coronary artery disease using real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography: a comparison with dual-isotope resting thallium-201/stress technectium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  Shoa-Lin Lin; Kuan-Rau Chiou; Wei-Chun Huang; Nan-Jing Peng; Daw-Guey Tsay; Chun-Peng Liu
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  Changes in transmural distribution of myocardial perfusion assessed by quantitative intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography in humans.

Authors:  S Fukuda; T Muro; T Hozumi; H Watanabe; K Shimada; M Yoshiyama; K Takeuchi; J Yoshikawa
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 10.  Imaging the myocardial ischemic cascade.

Authors:  Arthur E Stillman; Matthijs Oudkerk; David A Bluemke; Menko Jan de Boer; Jens Bremerich; Ernest V Garcia; Matthias Gutberlet; Pim van der Harst; W Gregory Hundley; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Dirkjan Kuijpers; Raymond Y Kwong; Eike Nagel; Stamatios Lerakis; John Oshinski; Jean-François Paul; Riemer H J A Slart; Vinod Thourani; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Bernd J Wintersperger
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.