Literature DB >> 11490325

Assessment of no-reflow phenomenon after acute myocardial infarction with harmonic angiography and intravenous pump infusion with Levovist: comparison with intracoronary contrast injection.

L Agati1, S Funaro, F Bilotta.   

Abstract

Myocardial contrast echocardiography (intracoronary application) has emerged as an accurate method to detect the "no-reflow phenomenon." To investigate the diagnostic value of harmonic angiography after intravenous infusion of Levovist in assessing "no-reflow," both intracoronary and intravenous contrast injections were performed in a group of patients with acute myocardial infarction. Seventeen consecutive patients with a successfully reperfused acute myocardial infarction within 6 hours of symptom onset were selected for this study. All patients underwent contrast echocardiography with harmonic angiography with Levovist (400 mg/mL, intravenous pump infusion, trigger intervals 1:4 to 1:8) and sonicated albumin (0.5 to 1 mL, intracoronary bolus) on day 1 after the achievement of a sustained coronary reflow. Myocardial perfusion was qualitatively assessed with a 12-segment model. The endocardial length of the residual contrast defect after reflow was also calculated. Forty-four of 204 segments were not analyzed after intravenous contrast echocardiography and 37 after intracoronary contrast echocardiography because of artifacts. Intracoronary and intravenous injections showed a perfusion defect in 31 (19%) segments, with a concordance of 89% (kappa coefficient, 0.72). Concordance in anteroseptal, anterolateral, and inferolateral segments was 95% (kappa = 0.92), 88% (kappa = 0.66), and 83% (kappa = 0.57), respectively. With intracoronary injection used as the reference method, intravenous injection had a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 93% for diagnosing contrast defects. The endocardial extent of no-reflow was 18 +/- 19 after intravenous and 21 +/- 17 after intracoronary contrast echocardiography (P = not significant). Intravenous contrast echocardiography with Levovist reliably identifies the no-reflow phenomenon after successful reperfusion, especially in acute anteroseptal myocardial infarction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11490325     DOI: 10.1067/mje.2001.113235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  3 in total

1.  A comparison of video and digital data in the assessment of myocardial perfusion abnormalities by myocardial contrast echocardiography.

Authors:  Hisashi Masugata; Kazushi Yukiiri; Yuichiro Takagi; Koji Ohmori; Katsufumi Mizushige; Masakazu Kohno
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Spatial distribution of right ventricular perfusion abnormalities following acute right coronary artery occlusion: a study by myocardial contrast echocardiography and blue dye staining.

Authors:  Hisashi Masugata; Shoichi Senda; Norihiro Fujita; Katsufumi Mizushige; Koji Ohmori; Masakazu Kohno
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Quantitative assessment of harmonic power doppler myocardial perfusion imaging with intravenous Levovist in patients with myocardial infarction: comparison with myocardial viability evaluated by coronary flow reserve and coronary flow pattern of infarct-related artery.

Authors:  Tomoko Tani; Kazuaki Tanabe; Minako Tani; Fumie Ono; Minako Katayama; Koichi Tamita; Shuichiro Kaji; Atsushi Yamamuro; Kunihiko Nagai; Kenichi Shiratori; Shigefumi Morioka; Yasuki Kihara
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 2.062

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.