Literature DB >> 16050881

Long-term follow-up of a longitudinal faculty development program in teaching skills.

Amy M Knight1, Karan A Cole, David E Kern, L Randol Barker, Ken Kolodner, Scott M Wright.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The long-term impact of longitudinal faculty development programs (FDPs) is not well understood.
OBJECTIVE: To follow up past participants in the Johns Hopkins Faculty Development Program in Teaching Skills and members of a comparison group in an effort to describe the long-term impact of the program. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: In July 2002, we surveyed all 242 participants in the program from 1987 through 2000, and 121 members of a comparison group selected by participants as they entered the program from 1988 through 1995. MEASUREMENTS: Professional characteristics, scholarly activity, teaching activity, teaching proficiency, and teaching behaviors.
RESULTS: Two hundred participants (83%) and 99 nonparticipants (82%) responded. When participants and nonparticipants from 1988 to 1995 were compared, participants were more likely to have taught medical students and house officers in the last year (both P<.05). Participants rated their proficiency for giving feedback more highly (P<.05). Participants scored higher than nonparticipants for 14 out of 15 behaviors related to being learner centered, building a supportive learning environment, giving and receiving feedback, and being effective leaders, half of which were statistically significant (P<.05). When remote and recent participants from 1987 through 2000 were compared with each other, few differences were found.
CONCLUSIONS: Participation in the longitudinal FDP was associated with continued teaching activities, desirable teaching behaviors, and higher self-assessments related to giving feedback and learner centeredness. Institutions should consider supporting faculty wishing to participate in FDPs in teaching skills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16050881      PMCID: PMC1490179          DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0145.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  30 in total

1.  Academic careers in medical education: perceptions of the effects of a faculty development program.

Authors:  M B Marks
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Longitudinal outcomes of an executive-model program for faculty development.

Authors:  A Teherani; M A Hitchcock; J G Nyquist
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Faculty development for educational leadership and scholarship.

Authors:  Larry D Gruppen; Alice Z Frohna; Robert M Anderson; Kimberly D Lowe
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 4.  Feedback and reflection: teaching methods for clinical settings.

Authors:  William T Branch; Anuradha Paranjape
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Development and implementation of an objective structured teaching exercise (OSTE) to evaluate improvement in feedback skills following a faculty development workshop.

Authors:  Sarah Stone; Kathleen Mazor; Sarah Devaney-O'Neil; Susan Starr; Warren Ferguson; Scott Wellman; Eric Jacobson; David S Hatem; Mark Quirk
Journal:  Teach Learn Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.414

6.  Evaluation of primary care futures: a faculty development program for community health center preceptors.

Authors:  M E Quirk; T DeWitt; D Lasser; M Huppert; E Hunniwell
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  What's the use of faculty development? Program evaluation using retrospective self-assessments and independent performance ratings.

Authors:  M G Hewson; H L Copeland; A J Fishleder
Journal:  Teach Learn Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.414

8.  A teaching scholars program to develop leaders in medical education.

Authors:  Yvonne Steinert; Louise Nasmith; Peter J McLeod; Larry Conochie
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  Helping medical school faculty realize their dreams: an innovative, collaborative mentoring program.

Authors:  Linda H Pololi; Sharon M Knight; Kay Dennis; Richard M Frankel
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  Faculty development seminars based on the one-minute preceptor improve feedback in the ambulatory setting.

Authors:  Stephen M Salerno; Patrick G O'Malley; Louis N Pangaro; Gary A Wheeler; Lisa K Moores; Jeffrey L Jackson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  13 in total

1.  Longitudinal Outcomes of an Elective Academic and Administrative Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience.

Authors:  Melissa S Medina; Marcus Tad Autry; JoLaine R Draugalis; Stephen B Neely; Mary R Shreffler; Sarah B Hausner
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  An association between paying physician-teachers for their teaching efforts and an improved educational experience for learners.

Authors:  Bimal Ashar; Rachel Levine; Jeffrey Magaziner; Robert Shochet; Scott Wright
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Finding time for faculty development.

Authors:  Melissa S Medina; Gina D Garrison; Gayle A Brazeau
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Report of the 2011-2012 Academic Affairs Standing Committee: the evolving role of scholarly teaching in teaching excellence for current and future faculty.

Authors:  Melissa S Medina; Alicia S Bouldin; Michael Gonyeau; Julie C Kissack; Wanda T Maldonado; Russell B Melchert; Oussayma Moukhachen; Cecilia M Plaza
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Physician characteristics associated with proficiency in feedback skills.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Menachery; Amy M Knight; Ken Kolodner; Scott M Wright
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Faculty development to enhance humanistic teaching and role modeling: a collaborative study at eight institutions.

Authors:  William T Branch; Calvin L Chou; Neil J Farber; David Hatem; Craig Keenan; Gregory Makoul; Mariah Quinn; William Salazar; Jane Sillman; Margaret Stuber; LuAnn Wilkerson; George Mathew; Michael Fost
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Faculty development programs improve the quality of Multiple Choice Questions items' writing.

Authors:  Hamza Mohammad Abdulghani; Farah Ahmad; Mohammad Irshad; Mahmoud Salah Khalil; Ghadeer Khalid Al-Shaikh; Sadiqa Syed; Abdulmajeed Abdurrahman Aldrees; Norah Alrowais; Shafiul Haque
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A ten-month program in curriculum development for medical educators: 16 years of experience.

Authors:  Donna M Windish; Aysegul Gozu; Eric B Bass; Patricia A Thomas; Stephen D Sisson; Donna M Howard; David E Kern
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  A Multi-Institutional Longitudinal Faculty Development Program in Humanism Supports the Professional Development of Faculty Teachers.

Authors:  William T Branch; Richard M Frankel; Janet P Hafler; Amy B Weil; MaryAnn C Gilligan; Debra K Litzelman; Margaret Plews-Ogan; Elizabeth A Rider; Lars G Osterberg; Dana Dunne; Natalie B May; Arthur R Derse
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  Effectiveness of longitudinal faculty development programs on MCQs items writing skills: A follow-up study.

Authors:  Hamza Mohammad Abdulghani; Mohammad Irshad; Shafiul Haque; Tauseef Ahmad; Kamran Sattar; Mahmoud Salah Khalil
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.