Literature DB >> 12390554

Faculty development seminars based on the one-minute preceptor improve feedback in the ambulatory setting.

Stephen M Salerno1, Patrick G O'Malley, Louis N Pangaro, Gary A Wheeler, Lisa K Moores, Jeffrey L Jackson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: While several models of medical student instruction in the ambulatory setting exist, few have been formally studied. We wished to assess the impact of a faculty development workshop based on the One-Minute Preceptor model on the amount and quality of feedback in the outpatient setting.
DESIGN: Ambulatory teaching behaviors were studied during consecutive outpatient precepting sessions before and after 3 faculty development workshops. Student-teacher interactions were assessed using audiotapes of teaching encounters coded through qualitative techniques, and surveys of teacher, learner, and patient satisfaction.
SETTING: Ambulatory internal medicine clinic in a tertiary care medical center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Nine board-certified internist faculty preceptors and 44 third-year medical students.
INTERVENTIONS: Three 90-minute faculty development seminars based on the One-Minute Preceptor teaching model.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Ninety-four encounters with 18577 utterances were recorded, half before and half after the seminars. After the workshops, the proportion of utterances that contained feedback increased from 17% to 22% (P =.09) and was more likely to be specific (9% vs 15%; P =.02). After the workshops, teachers reported that the learning encounters were more successful (P =.03) and that they were better at letting the students reach their own Conclusions (P =.001), at evaluating the learners (P =.03), and at creating plans for post-encounter learning (P =.02). The workshops had no effect on the duration of the student-teacher encounter or on student or patient satisfaction with the encounters.
CONCLUSIONS: Brief, interactive, faculty development workshops based on the One-Minute Preceptor model of clinical teaching resulted in modest improvements in the quality of feedback delivered in the ambulatory setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12390554      PMCID: PMC1495113          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.11233.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  25 in total

1.  Feedback notes: a system for feedback to students and residents. Advanced Education Faculty Development Group.

Authors:  T R Schum; R L Krippendorf
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  A five-step "microskills" model of clinical teaching.

Authors:  J O Neher; K C Gordon; B Meyer; N Stevens
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug

3.  Improving clinical teaching skills using the parallel process model.

Authors:  M K Marvel
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.756

4.  Using audiotapes to monitor student-preceptor interactions in a decentralized clerkship.

Authors:  P Schwiebert; D Cacy; A Davis
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 1.756

5.  Family practice house officer perceptions of faculty teaching behaviors.

Authors:  J G Jolissaint; B W Blount
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.437

6.  Preceptors' strategies for correcting residents in an ambulatory care medicine setting: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  J Ende; A Pomerantz; F Erickson
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  Giving feedback in medical education: verification of recommended techniques.

Authors:  M G Hewson; M L Little
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Strategies for efficient and effective teaching in the ambulatory care setting.

Authors:  G Ferenchick; D Simpson; J Blackman; D DaRosa; G Dunnington
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  Patients' ratings of outpatient visits in different practice settings. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  H R Rubin; B Gandek; W H Rogers; M Kosinski; C A McHorney; J E Ware
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Teaching and learning in ambulatory care settings: a thematic review of the literature.

Authors:  D M Irby
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.893

View more
  23 in total

1.  Interactive faculty development seminars improve the quality of written feedback in ambulatory teaching.

Authors:  Stephen M Salerno; Jeffrey L Jackson; Patrick G O'Malley
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Feedback and the mini clinical evaluation exercise.

Authors:  Eric S Holmboe; Monica Yepes; Frederick Williams; Stephen J Huot
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Ten tips for teaching in the theatre tearoom: shifting the focus from teaching to learning.

Authors:  Rosalind L Jeffree; Rufus M Clarke
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Teaching when time is limited.

Authors:  David M Irby; LuAnn Wilkerson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-02-16

5.  Pharmacy student and preceptor perceptions of preceptor teaching behaviors.

Authors:  Paveena Sonthisombat
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  How Pharmacist Preceptors Foster Students' Therapeutic Reasoning Using the One-Minute Preceptor Method.

Authors:  Kayley Lyons; Jacqueline E McLaughlin; Michael D Wolcott; Rebecca Grandy; Charlene R Williams
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Long-term follow-up of a longitudinal faculty development program in teaching skills.

Authors:  Amy M Knight; Karan A Cole; David E Kern; L Randol Barker; Ken Kolodner; Scott M Wright
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  The Quality of Written Feedback by Attendings of Internal Medicine Residents.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Jackson; Cynthia Kay; Wilkins C Jackson; Michael Frank
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  The impact of the Stanford Faculty Development Program on ambulatory teaching behavior.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Berbano; Robert Browning; Louis Pangaro; Jeffrey L Jackson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Facilitating preceptor and student communication in a dental school teaching clinic.

Authors:  Ronald L Sakaguchi
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.