Literature DB >> 18078975

Retinotopy of the face aftereffect.

Seyed-Reza Afraz1, Patrick Cavanagh.   

Abstract

Physiological results for the size of face-specific units in inferotemporal cortex (IT) support an extraordinarily large range of possible sizes--from 2.5 degrees to 30 degrees or more. We use a behavioral test of face-specific aftereffects to measure the face analysis regions and find a coarse retinotopy consistent with receptive fields of intermediate size (10 degrees -12 degrees at 3 degrees eccentricity). In the first experiment, observers were adapted to a single face at 3 degrees from fixation. A test (a morph of the face and its anti-face) was then presented at different locations around fixation and subjects classified it as face or anti-face. The face aftereffect (FAE) was not constant at all test locations--it dropped to half its maximum value for tests 5 degrees from the adapting location. Simultaneous adaptation to both a face and its anti-face, placed at opposite locations across fixation, produced two separate regions of opposite aftereffects. However, with four stimuli, faces alternating with anti-faces equally spaced around fixation, the FAE was greatly reduced at all locations, implying a fairly coarse localization of the aftereffect. In the second experiment, observers adapted to a face and its anti-face presented either simultaneously or in alternation. Results showed that the simultaneous presentation of a face and its anti-face leads to stronger FAEs than sequential presentation, suggesting that face processing has a dynamic nature and its region of analysis is sharpened when there is more than one face in the scene. In the final experiment, a face and two anti-face flankers with different spatial offsets were presented during adaptation and the FAE was measured at the face location. Results showed that FAE at the face location was inhibited more as the distance of anti-face flankers to the face stimulus was reduced. This confirms the spatial extent of face analysis regions in a test with a fixed number of stimuli where only distance varied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18078975      PMCID: PMC2674370          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.10.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  71 in total

1.  Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects.

Authors:  D A Leopold; A J O'Toole; T Vetter; V Blanz
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces.

Authors:  M A Webster; O H MacLin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-12

3.  Spatial sensitivity of macaque inferior temporal neurons.

Authors:  H Op De Beeck; R Vogels
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2000-10-30       Impact factor: 3.215

4.  Reading without saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  G S Rubin; K Turano
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming.

Authors:  I Biederman; E E Cooper
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Limited translation invariance of human visual pattern recognition.

Authors:  M Dill; M Fahle
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-01

7.  The role of visual field position in pattern-discrimination learning.

Authors:  M Dill; M Fahle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Spatial attention effects in macaque area V4.

Authors:  C E Connor; D C Preddie; J L Gallant; D C Van Essen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Suppression of visual responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex of the awake macaque by addition of a second stimulus.

Authors:  E K Miller; P M Gochin; C G Gross
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1993-07-09       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 10.  Functional analysis of primary visual cortex (V1) in humans.

Authors:  R B Tootell; N K Hadjikhani; W Vanduffel; A K Liu; J D Mendola; M I Sereno; A M Dale
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  37 in total

1.  Neural correlates of after-effects caused by adaptation to multiple face displays.

Authors:  Krisztina Nagy; Márta Zimmer; Mark W Greenlee; Gyula Kovács
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  High-level visual object representations are constrained by position.

Authors:  Dwight J Kravitz; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  The visual system supports online translation invariance for object identification.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Bowers; Ivan I Vankov; Casimir J H Ludwig
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

4.  Position sensitivity in the visual word form area.

Authors:  Andreas M Rauschecker; Reno F Bowen; Josef Parvizi; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Position specificity of adaptation-related face aftereffects.

Authors:  Márta Zimmer; Gyula Kovács
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Saccadic remapping of object-selective information.

Authors:  Benjamin A Wolfe; David Whitney
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Optogenetic and pharmacological suppression of spatial clusters of face neurons reveal their causal role in face gender discrimination.

Authors:  Arash Afraz; Edward S Boyden; James J DiCarlo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Adaptation and the perception of facial age.

Authors:  Sean F O'Neil; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2011

Review 9.  Adaptation and visual coding.

Authors:  Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Sensory and decision-making processes underlying perceptual adaptation.

Authors:  Nathan Witthoft; Long Sha; Jonathan Winawer; Roozbeh Kiani
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.