Literature DB >> 10536029

Invariance between subjects of brain wave representations of language.

P Suppes1, B Han, J Epelboim, Z L Lu.   

Abstract

In three experiments, electric brain waves of 19 subjects were recorded under several different experimental conditions for two purposes. One was to test how well we could recognize which sentence, from a set of 24 or 48 sentences, was being processed in the cortex. The other was to study the invariance of brain waves between subjects. As in our earlier work, the analysis consisted of averaging over trials to create prototypes and test samples, to both of which Fourier transforms were applied, followed by filtering and an inverse transformation to the time domain. A least-squares criterion of fit between prototypes and test samples was used for classification. In all three experiments, averaging over subjects improved the recognition rates. The most significant finding was the following. When brain waves were averaged separately for two nonoverlapping groups of subjects, one for prototypes and the other for test samples, we were able to recognize correctly 90% of the brain waves generated by 48 different sentences about European geography.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10536029      PMCID: PMC23179          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.22.12953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  3 in total

1.  Reading without saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  G S Rubin; K Turano
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Brain-wave recognition of sentences.

Authors:  P Suppes; B Han; Z L Lu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Brain wave recognition of words.

Authors:  P Suppes; Z L Lu; B Han
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

  3 in total
  10 in total

1.  Invariance of brain-wave representations of simple visual images and their names.

Authors:  P Suppes; B Han; J Epelboim; Z L Lu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Brain-wave representation of words by superposition of a few sine waves.

Authors:  P Suppes; B Han
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Identifying fragments of natural speech from the listener's MEG signals.

Authors:  Miika Koskinen; Jaakko Viinikanoja; Mikko Kurimo; Arto Klami; Samuel Kaski; Riitta Hari
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Phase patterns of neuronal responses reliably discriminate speech in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Huan Luo; David Poeppel
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Decoding word and category-specific spatiotemporal representations from MEG and EEG.

Authors:  Alexander M Chan; Eric Halgren; Ksenija Marinkovic; Sydney S Cash
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Identification of vowels in consonant-vowel-consonant words from speech imagery based EEG signals.

Authors:  Sandhya Chengaiyan; Anandha Sree Retnapandian; Kavitha Anandan
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 5.082

7.  Attentional gain control of ongoing cortical speech representations in a "cocktail party".

Authors:  Jess R Kerlin; Antoine J Shahin; Lee M Miller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Structural similarities between brain and linguistic data provide evidence of semantic relations in the brain.

Authors:  Colleen E Crangle; Marcos Perreau-Guimaraes; Patrick Suppes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Neural Oscillations Carry Speech Rhythm through to Comprehension.

Authors:  Jonathan E Peelle; Matthew H Davis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-09-06

10.  Left Superior Temporal Gyrus Is Coupled to Attended Speech in a Cocktail-Party Auditory Scene.

Authors:  Marc Vander Ghinst; Mathieu Bourguignon; Marc Op de Beeck; Vincent Wens; Brice Marty; Sergio Hassid; Georges Choufani; Veikko Jousmäki; Riitta Hari; Patrick Van Bogaert; Serge Goldman; Xavier De Tiège
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 6.167

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.