Literature DB >> 16099015

Serifs and font legibility.

Aries Arditi1, Jianna Cho.   

Abstract

Using lower-case fonts varying only in serif size (0%, 5%, and 10% cap height), we assessed legibility using size thresholds and reading speed. Five percentage serif fonts were slightly more legible than sans serif, but the average inter-letter spacing increase that serifs themselves impose, predicts greater enhancement than we observed. RSVP and continuous reading speeds showed no effect of serifs. When text is small or distant, serifs may, then, produce a tiny legibility increase due to the concomitant increase in spacing. However, our data exhibited no difference in legibility between typefaces that differ only in the presence or absence of serifs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16099015      PMCID: PMC4612630          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  11 in total

1.  High and low luminance letters, acuity reserve, and font effects on reading speed.

Authors:  D Yager; K Aquilante; R Plass
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Reading with fixed and variable character pitch.

Authors:  A Arditi; K Knoblauch; I Grunwald
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Psychophysics of reading. VIII. The Minnesota Low-Vision Reading Test.

Authors:  G E Legge; J A Ross; A Luebker; J M LaMay
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Reading without saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  G S Rubin; K Turano
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Lapse resistance in the verbal letter reporting task.

Authors:  Aries Arditi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07-25       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Experiments on the legibility of symbols of different width and height.

Authors:  C BERGER
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1950

7.  Psychophysics of reading. XV: Font effects in normal and low vision.

Authors:  J S Mansfield; G E Legge; M C Bane
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Psychophysics of reading--I. Normal vision.

Authors:  G E Legge; D G Pelli; G S Rubin; M M Schleske
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Low vision reading with sequential word presentation.

Authors:  G S Rubin; K Turano
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  The design and application of effective written instructional material: a review of published work.

Authors:  John F Mayberry
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Comparison of reading speed with 3 different log-scaled reading charts.

Authors:  Noor Halilah Buari; Ai-Hong Chen; Nuraini Musa
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2014-01-28

3.  If it's hard to read, it changes how long you do it: reading time as an explanation for perceptual fluency effects on judgment.

Authors:  Christopher A Sanchez; Allison J Jaeger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-02

4.  Fonts Designed for Macular Degeneration: Impact on Reading.

Authors:  Ying-Zi Xiong; Ethan A Lorsung; John Stephen Mansfield; Charles Bigelow; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Digital Reading with Low Vision: Principles for Selecting Display Size.

Authors:  Ying-Zi Xiong; Nilsu Atilgan; Donald C Fletcher; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 2.106

6.  Rethinking ADA signage standards for low-vision accessibility.

Authors:  Aries Arditi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Toward developing a standardized Arabic continuous text reading chart.

Authors:  Balsam Alabdulkader; Susan Jennifer Leat
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2016-05-06

8.  Dyslexie font does not benefit reading in children with or without dyslexia.

Authors:  Sanne M Kuster; Marjolijn van Weerdenburg; Marjolein Gompel; Anna M T Bosman
Journal:  Ann Dyslexia       Date:  2017-12-04

9.  Enhanced text spacing improves reading performance in individuals with macular disease.

Authors:  Sally Blackmore-Wright; Mark A Georgeson; Stephen J Anderson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Age-related differences in the legibility of degraded text.

Authors:  Benjamin Wolfe; Jonathan Dobres; Anna Kosovicheva; Ruth Rosenholtz; Bryan Reimer
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2016-12-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.