Literature DB >> 17675131

Letter case and text legibility in normal and low vision.

Aries Arditi1, Jianna Cho.   

Abstract

It is thought by cognitive scientists and typographers alike, that lower-case text is more legible than upper-case. Yet lower-case letters are, on average, smaller in height and width than upper-case characters, which suggests an upper-case advantage. Using a single unaltered font and all upper-, all lower-, and mixed-case text, we assessed size thresholds for words and random strings, and reading speeds for text with normal and visually impaired participants. Lower-case thresholds were roughly 0.1 log unit higher than upper. Reading speeds were higher for upper- than for mixed-case text at sizes twice acuity size; at larger sizes, the upper-case advantage disappeared. Results suggest that upper-case is more legible than the other case styles, especially for visually-impaired readers, because smaller letter sizes can be used than with the other case styles, with no diminution of legibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17675131      PMCID: PMC2016788          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  9 in total

1.  Prescribing near magnification for low vision patients.

Authors:  Jan E Lovie-Kitchin; Stephen G Whittaker
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  Psychophysics of reading. VIII. The Minnesota Low-Vision Reading Test.

Authors:  G E Legge; J A Ross; A Luebker; J M LaMay
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Reading without saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  G S Rubin; K Turano
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Lapse resistance in the verbal letter reporting task.

Authors:  Aries Arditi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07-25       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The effect of type size and case alternation on word identification.

Authors:  F Smith; D Lott; B Cronnell
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1969-06

Review 7.  Visual requirements for reading.

Authors:  S G Whittaker; J Lovie-Kitchin
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Psychophysics of reading--I. Normal vision.

Authors:  G E Legge; D G Pelli; G S Rubin; M M Schleske
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Low vision reading with sequential word presentation.

Authors:  G S Rubin; K Turano
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.886

  9 in total
  8 in total

1.  Comparison of reading speed with 3 different log-scaled reading charts.

Authors:  Noor Halilah Buari; Ai-Hong Chen; Nuraini Musa
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2014-01-28

2.  The legibility of prescription medication labelling in Canada: Moving from pharmacy-centred to patient-centred labels.

Authors:  Susan J Leat; Kristina Ahrens; Abinaya Krishnamoorthy; Deborah Gold; Carlos H Rojas-Fernandez
Journal:  Can Pharm J (Ott)       Date:  2014-05

3.  Comparing reading speed for horizontal and vertical English text.

Authors:  Deyue Yu; Heejung Park; David Gerold; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Normal susceptibility to visual illusions in abnormal development: evidence from Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Melanie Palomares; Chinyere Ogbonna; Barbara Landau; Howard Egeth
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  A tutorial on aphasia test development in any language: Key substantive and psychometric considerations.

Authors:  Maria V Ivanova; Brooke Hallowell
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 2.773

6.  What is the impact of increasing the prominence of calorie labelling? A stepped wedge randomised controlled pilot trial in worksite cafeterias.

Authors:  Milica Vasiljevic; Georgia Fuller; Mark Pilling; Gareth J Hollands; Rachel Pechey; Susan A Jebb; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 3.868

7.  Rethinking ADA signage standards for low-vision accessibility.

Authors:  Aries Arditi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Visual Demand and Acuity Reserve of Chinese versus English Newspapers.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Jingbo Liu; Srichand Jasti; Rajaraman Suryakumar; Mark A Bullimore
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.106

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.