Literature DB >> 16044280

[Conventional techniques of visual field examination Part 2: confrontation visual field testing -- kinetic perimetry].

U Schiefer1, J Pätzold, F Dannheim.   

Abstract

Evaluation of visual field findings is an essential ophthalmological task. Applying psychophysical principles enables noninvasive (topo-)diagnosis in cases of unexplained visual loss or suspected lesions of the visual pathway. Furthermore, any kind of expert opinion or ability test critically depends on adequate visual field findings. Repeated examinations allow functional follow-up of a disease and assessment of therapeutic efficiency. This paper explicitly focuses on conventional strategies since these are widespread, easily accessible, standardized, and well established in everyday practice over years. Standardized white-on-white perimetry with moving targets (kinetic perimetry) is the major topic of this paper (part 2) in addition to "rough"/preliminary confrontation visual field testing. This review series is aimed at imparting basic concepts in perimetry and psychophysics to ophthalmologists and also addresses interested physicians from other disciplines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16044280     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-005-1212-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  4 in total

Review 1.  [Conventional perimetry I: introduction--basics].

Authors:  U Schiefer; J Pätzold; F Dannheim
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Optimal rates of movement for kinetic perimetry.

Authors:  C A Johnson; J L Keltner
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-01

3.  The Riddoch phenomenon revealed in non-occipital lobe lesions.

Authors:  R J Zappia; J M Enoch; R Stamper; J Z Winkelman; A J Gay
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Statokinetic dissociation in lesions of the anterior visual pathways. A reappraisal of the Riddoch phenomenon.

Authors:  A B Safran; J S Glaser
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1980-02
  4 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  [Conventional perimetry. Part 3: Static perimetry: grid--strategy--visualisation].

Authors:  U Schiefer; J Pätzold; B Wabbels; F Dannheim
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  [Conventional techniques of visual field examination: part 4 Static perimetry: interpretation--perimetric indices--follow-up--perimetry in childhood].

Authors:  U Schiefer; J Pätzold; B Wabbels; F Dannheim
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  [Functional glaucoma diagnosis].

Authors:  C Erb; K Göbel
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 4.  [Recommendations for a standardized perimetry within the framework of epilepsy surgery].

Authors:  M T Lutz; T Mayer; U Schiefer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  [Conventional perimetry. Antiquated or indispensable for functional glaucoma diagnostics?].

Authors:  F Tonagel; B Voykov; U Schiefer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Normal Values for the Full Visual Field, Corrected for Age- and Reaction Time, Using Semiautomated Kinetic Testing on the Octopus 900 Perimeter.

Authors:  Julia Grobbel; Janko Dietzsch; Chris A Johnson; Reinhard Vonthein; Katarina Stingl; Richard G Weleber; Ulrich Schiefer
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 3.283

Review 7.  The value of visual field testing in the era of advanced imaging: clinical and psychophysical perspectives.

Authors:  Jack Phu; Sieu K Khuu; Michael Yapp; Nagi Assaad; Michael P Hennessy; Michael Kalloniatis
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.742

8.  Feasibility, Accuracy, and Repeatability of Suprathreshold Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry.

Authors:  Ian C Murray; Lorraine A Cameron; Alice D McTrusty; Antonios Perperidis; Harry M Brash; Brian W Fleck; Robert A Minns
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.283

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.