Literature DB >> 22527729

[Conventional perimetry. Antiquated or indispensable for functional glaucoma diagnostics?].

F Tonagel1, B Voykov, U Schiefer.   

Abstract

Despite its relatively long history conventional perimetry has preserved its role in (glaucoma) diagnostics by the continuous advancement of technical equipment, examination strategies and new methods for analysis and visualization of progression. A high standardization in execution and evaluation of visual field examination can now be obtained by the increasing use of computer technology. Standardized protocols become increasingly more useful especially in cases of chronic diseases, such as glaucoma where several suitable diagnostic methods must be applied over a long time period. For the assessment of functional deterioration several (numeric) perimetric indices are available in addition to clinical evaluation. The use of fast threshold estimating strategies and locally condensed grids are promising tools for early detection of the functional manifestation or progression of (glaucomatous) loss of visual field. In cases of advanced (glaucomatous) visual field loss, perimetry with (computer generated) moving stimuli (semi-automated kinetic perimetry) allows an efficient, standardized and patient-friendly edge detection of scotoma borders. This method is also very well suited for expert opinions and ability testing. The assessment by morphological or morphometric, hydrodynamic and other functional parameters serve as complementary diagnostic aids or as elementary tools for plausibility control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22527729     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-012-2543-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  80 in total

1.  Developing an algorithm to convert routine measures of vision into utility values for glaucoma.

Authors:  Yasmene Alavi; Mireia Jofre-Bonet; Catey Bunce; Richard P Wormald; Ananth Viswanathan; Allen Foster; Roger Hitchings
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.648

2.  Natural history of normal-tension glaucoma.

Authors:  D R Anderson; S M Drance; M Schulzer
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  The relationship between visual field loss in glaucoma and health-related quality-of-life.

Authors:  A van Gestel; C A B Webers; H J M Beckers; M C J M van Dongen; J L Severens; F Hendrikse; J S A G Schouten
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  A note of fixation during perimetry.

Authors:  A Heijl; C E Krakau
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1977-10

5.  Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial: design and baseline data.

Authors:  M C Leske; A Heijl; L Hyman; B Bengtsson
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Clinical evaluation of frequency doubling technology perimetry using the Humphrey Matrix 24-2 threshold strategy.

Authors:  P G D Spry; H M Hussin; J M Sparrow
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Comparison of different methods for detecting glaucomatous visual field progression.

Authors:  Eija Vesti; Chris A Johnson; Balwantray C Chauhan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Comparison of glaucomatous progression between untreated patients with normal-tension glaucoma and patients with therapeutically reduced intraocular pressures. Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  The effectiveness of intraocular pressure reduction in the treatment of normal-tension glaucoma. Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 10.  Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma.

Authors:  B C Chauhan; D F Garway-Heath; F J Goñi; L Rossetti; B Bengtsson; A C Viswanathan; A Heijl
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 4.638

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Functional diagnostic options for advanced and end stage glaucoma].

Authors:  A F Scheuerle; U Schiefer; K Rohrschneider
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Comparative glaucomatous diagnosis using macular optical coherence tomography and perimetry with centrally condensed stimuli: English version.

Authors:  A Sturm; W Noske
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  [Correlation of morphological and functional glaucoma diagnostics with macular OCT and perimetry with centrally condensed stimuli: German version].

Authors:  A Sturm; W Noske
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.059

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.