Literature DB >> 16496107

[Conventional techniques of visual field examination: part 4 Static perimetry: interpretation--perimetric indices--follow-up--perimetry in childhood].

U Schiefer1, J Pätzold, B Wabbels, F Dannheim.   

Abstract

Visual field examination with fixed stimuli was first realized in manual static profile perimetry. The transition from a linear stimulus alignment along a profile section towards a two-dimensional arrangement introduced the era of static grid perimetry. Application of computer technology nowadays allows automation and standardization of this procedure, which enables the examiner to select the necessary visual field area, the adequate grid, and the optimal strategy for an estimation of differential luminance sensitivity. Furthermore, the computer independently takes over the recording, visualization, and processing of the perimetric procedure. This contribution discusses conventional static visual field examinations since these are widely used, easily accessible, well established for practical application, and standardized. This paper (part 4) explicitly focuses on the correct interpretation of automated static strategies of visual field examinations. Furthermore the classification and scoring of visual field defects as well as quality control, progression analysis, and perimetry in childhood are addressed. This manuscript is based on three preceding parts, which were published in previous issues of this journal [27, 28, 29].

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16496107     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-005-1304-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  37 in total

1.  Feasibility and outcome of automated static perimetry in children using continuous light increment perimetry (CLIP) and fast threshold strategy.

Authors:  B K Wabbels; S Wilscher
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2005-12

2.  Comparison of analytic algorithms for detecting glaucomatous visual field loss.

Authors:  J Katz; A Sommer; D E Gaasterland; D R Anderson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-12

3.  Automated visual field examination in children aged 5-8 years. Part II: Normative values.

Authors:  C Tschopp; A B Safran; P Viviani; M Reicherts; A Bullinger; C Mermoud
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA.

Authors:  B Bengtsson; J Olsson; A Heijl; H Rootzén
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  1997-08

5.  Reliability indexes of automated perimetric tests.

Authors:  J Katz; A Sommer
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-09

Review 6.  [Age-dependent error rates in automatic screen campimetry with bright and dark stimuli].

Authors:  B Wabbels; U Schiefer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Feasibility of automated visual field examination in children between 5 and 8 years of age.

Authors:  A B Safran; G L Laffi; A Bullinger; P Viviani; C de Weisse; D Désangles; C Tschopp; C Mermoud
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Analysis of visual field progression in glaucoma.

Authors:  F W Fitzke; R A Hitchings; D Poinoosawmy; A I McNaught; D P Crabb
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Comparison of different methods for detecting glaucomatous visual field progression.

Authors:  Eija Vesti; Chris A Johnson; Balwantray C Chauhan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Comparison of glaucomatous progression between untreated patients with normal-tension glaucoma and patients with therapeutically reduced intraocular pressures. Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  [Functional glaucoma diagnosis].

Authors:  C Erb; K Göbel
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  [Recommendations for a standardized perimetry within the framework of epilepsy surgery].

Authors:  M T Lutz; T Mayer; U Schiefer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  [Stereometric parameters of the optic disc. Comparison between a simultaneous non-mydriatic stereoscopic fundus camera (KOWA WX 3D) and the Heidelberg scanning laser ophthalmoscope (HRT IIII)].

Authors:  K Januschowski; G Blumenstock; C E Rayford; K-U Bartz-Schmidt; U Schiefer; F Ziemssen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  [Conventional perimetry. Antiquated or indispensable for functional glaucoma diagnostics?].

Authors:  F Tonagel; B Voykov; U Schiefer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Morphometric Optic Nerve Head Analysis in Glaucoma Patients: A Comparison between the Simultaneous Nonmydriatic Stereoscopic Fundus Camera (Kowa Nonmyd WX3D) and the Heidelberg Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope (HRT III).

Authors:  Siegfried Mariacher; Stephanie Hipp; Robert Wirthky; Gunnar Blumenstock; Karl-Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt; Focke Ziemssen; Ulrich Schiefer; Bogomil Voykov; Kai Januschowski
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 1.909

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.