Literature DB >> 3800748

Optimal rates of movement for kinetic perimetry.

C A Johnson, J L Keltner.   

Abstract

Duration, reliability, and sensitivity of kinetic thresholds were evaluated for the I/4e, I/2e, and I/1e Goldmann-equivalent targets as a function of stimulus velocity (1 degrees to 8 degrees/s) using the SQUID automated perimeter. For all targets, the average duration of kinetic meridional scans decreased significantly as stimulus velocity increased from 1 degrees to 4 degrees/s. Minimal reductions in kinetic scan times were present for stimulus velocities above 4 degrees/s. All targets appeared to have reductions in sensitivity at velocities above 4 degrees/s (target detection occurring at more central visual field locations) that were presumably related to the observers' reaction times. There were no consistent differences in the variability of kinetic thresholds for different stimulus velocities. When all factors were considered, a stimulus velocity of 4 degrees/s seemed to be optimal for kinetic scans of all targets in the central and peripheral visual field.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3800748     DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1987.01060010079035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  9 in total

Review 1.  [Conventional techniques of visual field examination Part 2: confrontation visual field testing -- kinetic perimetry].

Authors:  U Schiefer; J Pätzold; F Dannheim
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  K-Train--a computer-based, interactive training program with an incorporated certification system for practicing kinetic perimetry: evaluation of acceptance and success rate.

Authors:  U Schiefer; K Nowomiejska; E Krapp; J Pätzold; C A Johnson
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Effects of mydriasis and miosis on kinetic perimetry findings in normal participants.

Authors:  Kazunori Hirasawa; Nobuyuki Shoji; Chieko Kobashi; Ayaka Yamanashi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  The use of semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP) to monitor advanced glaucomatous visual field loss.

Authors:  J Nevalainen; J Paetzold; E Krapp; R Vonthein; C A Johnson; U Schiefer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  The accuracy of confrontation visual field test in comparison with automated perimetry.

Authors:  L N Johnson; F G Baloh
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  Functional characteristics of glaucoma related arcuate defects seen on OCT en face visualisation of the retinal nerve fibre layer.

Authors:  Bright S Ashimatey; Brett J King; William H Swanson
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Effects of different levels of intraocular stray light on kinetic perimetry findings.

Authors:  Kazunori Hirasawa; Nobuyuki Shoji; Karen Isono; Manami Tsuchiya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Does intraocular straylight predict night driving visual performance? Correlations between straylight levels and contrast sensitivity, halo size, and hazard recognition distance with and without glare.

Authors:  Judith Ungewiss; Ulrich Schiefer; Peter Eichinger; Michael Wörner; David P Crabb; Pete R Jones
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 3.473

9.  Differences in Static and Kinetic Perimetry Results are Eliminated in Retinal Disease when Psychophysical Procedures are Equated.

Authors:  Jack Phu; Michael Kalloniatis; Henrietta Wang; Sieu K Khuu
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.283

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.