Literature DB >> 16036061

Noninvasive assessment of bone structure.

Tamara J Vokes1, Murray J Favus.   

Abstract

Bone fragility is determined by bone mass and trabecular structure. While bone mass can be readily measured as bone density, bone trabecular structure cannot be easily assessed by currently available methods. The realization of the importance of bone structure in determining fracture risk has led to the development of several imaging modalities aimed at evaluating the contribution of bone quality to its biomechanical strength and fragility. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography have limited spatial resolution and high cost but have a potential to generate true three-dimensional images of trabecular structure in vivo. Bone radiographs subjected to various forms of texture analysis have higher resolution and lower cost but provide only a two-dimensional representation of bone structure. Both two- and three-dimensional methods have been shown to predict biomechanical strength in vitro and to differentiate between subjects with and without fractures in vivo. Therefore, all of these methods deserve closer evaluation and also need further technical improvements before they can be considered for use in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 16036061     DOI: 10.1007/s11914-003-0004-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep        ISSN: 1544-1873            Impact factor:   5.096


  47 in total

Review 1.  Bone microstructure in osteoporosis: transilial biopsy and histomorphometry.

Authors:  M Janet Barger-Lux; Robert R Recker
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-10

2.  Morphometric texture analysis of spinal trabecular bone structure assessed using orthogonal radiographic projections.

Authors:  X Ouyang; S Majumdar; T M Link; Y Lu; P Augat; J Lin; D Newitt; H K Genant
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Power spectral analysis of vertebral trabecular bone structure from radiographs: orientation dependence and correlation with bone mineral density and mechanical properties.

Authors:  J Millard; P Augat; T M Link; M Kothari; D C Newitt; H K Genant; S Majumdar
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Assessment of trabecular structure using high resolution CT images and texture analysis.

Authors:  T M Link; S Majumdar; J C Lin; P Augat; R G Gould; D Newitt; X Ouyang; T F Lang; A Mathur; H K Genant
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Quantitative analysis of trabecular microstructure by 400 MHz nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  H W Chung; F W Wehrli; J L Williams; S D Kugelmass; S L Wehrli
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Multifractal radiographic analysis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  P Caligiuri; M L Giger; M Favus
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  In vivo assessment of trabecular bone structure using fractal analysis of distal radius radiographs.

Authors:  S Majumdar; T M Link; J Millard; J C Lin; P Augat; D Newitt; N Lane; H K Genant
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Bone structure of the distal radius and the calcaneus vs BMD of the spine and proximal femur in the prediction of osteoporotic spine fractures.

Authors:  Thomas M Link; Volker Vieth; Julia Matheis; David Newitt; Ying Lu; Ernst J Rummeny; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Patient-specific microarchitecture of vertebral cancellous bone: a peripheral quantitative computed tomographic and histological study.

Authors:  X Banse; J P Devogelaer; M Grynpas
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Computerized radiographic analysis of osteoporosis: preliminary evaluation.

Authors:  P Caligiuri; M L Giger; M J Favus; H Jia; K Doi; L B Dixon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Current technologies in the evaluation of bone architecture.

Authors:  Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 2.  Sex and ethnic differences in bone architecture.

Authors:  Dorothy A Nelson; Mary S Megyesi
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Noninvasive Raman spectroscopy of rat tibiae: approach to in vivo assessment of bone quality.

Authors:  Paul I Okagbare; Dana Begun; Mary Tecklenburg; Ayorinde Awonusi; Steven A Goldstein; Michael D Morris
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.170

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.