Literature DB >> 11128312

In vivo assessment of trabecular bone structure using fractal analysis of distal radius radiographs.

S Majumdar1, T M Link, J Millard, J C Lin, P Augat, D Newitt, N Lane, H K Genant.   

Abstract

Our purpose in this study was (i) to measure trabecular bone structure using fractal analysis of distal radius radiographs in subjects with and without osteoporotic hip fractures, and (ii) to compare these measures with bone mineral density (BMD) as well as with measures of trabecular bone structure derived from high resolution magnetic resonance (MR) images. Distal radius radiographs were obtained using semi-industrial films (55 kVp, 400 mAs) in 30 postmenopausal patients, who had suffered osteoporotic hip fractures (74.8+/-8.2 years) in the last 24 months and 27 postmenopausal age-matched (74.6+/-6.6 yr) normal volunteers. Radiographs were digitized at 50 microm. A Fourier power spectrum-based fractal dimension (FD) characterizing the trabecular pattern was measured in a region of interest proximal to the joint line. The fractal dimension was calculated over two spatial frequency (f) ranges: FD1 was calculated over 0.5<log(f)<l.0, FD2 over the higher range 1.0<log(f)<1.5. Trabecular BMD in the radius was obtained using peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) (Stratec GmbH, Germany). In addition BMD of the proximal femur was determined using dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (QDR 2000, Hologic, MA). In a subset of patients (16 controls and 18 with hip fractures), high resolution MR imaging of the distal radius (spatial resolution of 156 x 156 x 500 microm) was used to obtain measures analogous to bone histomorphometry. There were significant differences (p<0.05) between the fracture and nonfracture groups in the total femur BMD (13%), trabecular BMD in the distal radius (4%), and the fractal dimension in the radiographs (FD2) (3%). The correlations between FD2 and the total femur BMD as well as trabecular bone BMD in the distal radius were -0.48 (p<0.006) and -0.22 (p<0.33); respectively; FD1 increased with BMD and showed lower correlations. FD2 showed good correlations with App. Tb.N (-0.71) and App. Tb.Sp (0.69) (p<0.01), moderate correlation with App BV/TV (-0.53) (p<0.05), and no significant correlation with App. Tb.Th. The correlations between structural measures and FD1 showed the inverse trend and were typically lower. The odds ratios for a hip fracture were 2.44 for total femur BMD, 1.5 for trabecular BMD (radius), and 1.5 for FD2, respectively. In summary, the fractal measures derived from radiographs of the radius show differences between subjects with and without hip fractures, the predictive power of measures in the distal radius are comparable to radial trabecular BMD but lower than that of total hip BMD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11128312     DOI: 10.1118/1.1319375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  14 in total

Review 1.  Bone fractal analysis.

Authors:  Gian Pietro Feltrin; Roberto Stramare; Diego Miotto; Dario Giacomini; Claudio Saccavini
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 2.  Current technologies in the evaluation of bone architecture.

Authors:  Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of 68Ga-DOTATOC in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours scheduled for 90Y-DOTATOC therapy.

Authors:  Sophia Koukouraki; Ludwig G Strauss; Vassilios Georgoulias; Jochen Schuhmacher; Uwe Haberkorn; Nikolaos Karkavitsas; Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Random field assessment of inhomogeneous bone mineral density from DXA scans can enhance the differentiation between postmenopausal women with and without hip fractures.

Authors:  Xuanliang Neil Dong; Rajeshwar Pinninti; Timothy Lowe; Patricia Cussen; Joyce E Ballard; David Di Paolo; Mukul Shirvaikar
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Radiographic texture analysis of densitometer-generated calcaneus images differentiates postmenopausal women with and without fractures.

Authors:  T J Vokes; M L Giger; M R Chinander; T G Karrison; M J Favus; L B Dixon
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  A Comparison of Peripheral Imaging Technologies for Bone and Muscle Quantification: a Mixed Methods Clinical Review.

Authors:  Andy Kin On Wong
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 7.  Clinical utility of microarchitecture measurements of trabecular bone.

Authors:  Julio Carballido-Gamio; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.096

8.  Automated DXA-based finite element analysis for hip fracture risk stratification: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  S Yang; W D Leslie; Y Luo; A L Goertzen; S Ahmed; L M Ward; I Delubac; L M Lix
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Assessment of bone fragility with clinical imaging modalities.

Authors:  Xn Dong; X Wang
Journal:  Hard Tissue       Date:  2013-02-15

10.  Mandibular bone loss in an animal model of male osteoporosis (orchidectomized rat): a radiographic and densitometric study.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Lerouxel; Hélène Libouban; Marie-Françoise Moreau; Michel F Baslé; Maurice Audran; Daniel Chappard
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-06-05       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.