Literature DB >> 16032405

Dynamic visual-vestibular integration during goal directed human locomotion.

Nandini Deshpande1, Aftab E Patla.   

Abstract

Normal visual input plays a very dominant role during locomotion. Functionally, it can assist the central nervous system to overcome a destabilizing effect of abnormal or perturbed vestibular information. However, a recent study has shown a directional effect of transmastoidal galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) on gait trajectory when visual information is unreliable. The purpose of this study was to investigate how inputs from the visual and vestibular systems are weighted to optimize locomotor performance under impoverished visual conditions during goal directed locomotion. For unimodal stimulation, the visual input was manipulated using displacing prisms that caused 14 degrees horizontal displacement of perceived target location to the right or left. In addition, GVS (0.8 mAmp) was applied to manipulate vestibular system information during bimodal stimulation conditions. Two bimodal stimulation conditions were defined by the polarity of the galvanic current (anode on congruent and incongruent sides of prismatic deviation). The center of mass (CoM) displacement, head and trunk yaw angles and trunk roll angles were computed to analyze the global output as well as segmental coordination, as the participants walked towards the target. Although the performance was primarily guided by visual information, both congruent and incongruent GVS significantly altered CoM displacement. Similarly, the basic pattern of segmental responses during steering was maintained; however, the magnitude of the responses was altered. Spatio-temporal analysis demonstrated that during bimodal stimulation, the effect of GVS on global output tapered off as the participants approached the target. Results suggest a dynamic visual-vestibular interaction in which the gain of the vestibular input is initially upregulated in the presence of insufficient or impoverished visual information. However, there is a gradual habituation and the visual information, although insufficient, primarily dominates during goal directed locomotion. The experimental trajectories resembled mathematically simulated trajectories with a decaying GVS gain as opposed to a constant gain, further supporting the dynamic nature of sensory integration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16032405     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2364-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  25 in total

1.  Differential effects of vestibular stimulation on walking and running.

Authors:  K Jahn; M Strupp; E Schneider; M Dieterich; T Brandt
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-06-05       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Vestibular contributions across the execution of a voluntary forward step.

Authors:  Leah R Bent; J Timothy Inglis; Bradford J McFadyen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-01-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Effects of galvanic vestibular stimulation during human walking.

Authors:  R C Fitzpatrick; D L Wardman; J L Taylor
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Relative contributions of visual and vestibular information on the trajectory of human gait.

Authors:  Paul M Kennedy; Anthony N Carlsen; J Timothy Inglis; Rudy Chow; Ian M Franks; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Reciprocal inhibitory visual-vestibular interaction. Visual motion stimulation deactivates the parieto-insular vestibular cortex.

Authors:  T Brandt; P Bartenstein; A Janek; M Dieterich
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Visual influence on human locomotion. Modulation to changes in optic flow.

Authors:  T Prokop; M Schubert; W Berger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Early sensory determinants of locomotor speed in adult cats: I. Visual compensation after bilabyrinthectomy in cats and kittens.

Authors:  A R Marchand; B Amblard
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1990-03-26       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Effects of head immobilization on the coordination and control of head and body reorientation and translation during steering.

Authors:  M A Hollands; K L Sorensen; A E Patla
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Where and when do we look as we approach and step over an obstacle in the travel path?

Authors:  A E Patla; J N Vickers
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1997-12-01       Impact factor: 1.837

10.  Position and velocity responses to galvanic vestibular stimulation in human subjects during standing.

Authors:  Daniel L Wardman; Brian L Day; Richard C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-12-13       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  10 in total

1.  Changing lanes: inertial cues and explicit path information facilitate steering performance when visual feedback is removed.

Authors:  Kristen L Macuga; Andrew C Beall; Jonathan W Kelly; Roy S Smith; Jack M Loomis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Sensorimotor and cognitive factors associated with the age-related increase of visual field dependence: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Catherine P Agathos; Delphine Bernardin; Delphine Huchet; Anne-Catherine Scherlen; Christine Assaiante; Brice Isableu
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2015-06-30

3.  Human standing and walking: comparison of the effects of stimulation of the vestibular system.

Authors:  John F Iles; Richard Baderin; Rachel Tanner; Ariel Simon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Modeling locomotor dysfunction following spaceflight with Galvanic vestibular stimulation.

Authors:  Steven T Moore; Hamish G MacDougall; Brian T Peters; Jacob J Bloomberg; Ian S Curthoys; Helen S Cohen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Visual-vestibular interaction during goal directed locomotion: effects of aging and blurring vision.

Authors:  Nandini Deshpande; Aftab E Patla
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Proprioceptive deficits of the lower limb following anterior cruciate ligament deficiency affect whole body steering control.

Authors:  Rebecca J Reed-Jones; Lori Ann Vallis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Calibrating balance perturbation using electrical stimulation of the vestibular system.

Authors:  R Goel; M J Rosenberg; H S Cohen; J J Bloomberg; A P Mulavara
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 8.  Control of human gait stability through foot placement.

Authors:  Sjoerd M Bruijn; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Multisensory guided associative learning in healthy humans.

Authors:  Gabriella Eördegh; Attila Őze; Balázs Bodosi; András Puszta; Ákos Pertich; Anett Rosu; György Godó; Attila Nagy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Postural Changes During Exteroceptive Thin Plantar Stimulation: The Effect of Prolonged Use and Different Plantar Localizations.

Authors:  Marco Tramontano; Jacopo Piermaria; Giovanni Morone; Alice Reali; Martin Vergara; Federica Tamburella
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.