Literature DB >> 16763834

Modeling locomotor dysfunction following spaceflight with Galvanic vestibular stimulation.

Steven T Moore1, Hamish G MacDougall, Brian T Peters, Jacob J Bloomberg, Ian S Curthoys, Helen S Cohen.   

Abstract

In this study locomotor and gaze dysfunction commonly observed in astronauts following spaceflight were modeled using two Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) paradigms: (1) pseudorandom, and (2) head-coupled (proportional to the summed vertical linear acceleration and yaw angular velocity obtained from a head-mounted Inertial Measurement Unit). Locomotor and gaze function during GVS were assessed by tests previously used to evaluate post-flight astronaut performance; dynamic visual acuity (DVA) during treadmill locomotion at 80 m/min, and navigation of an obstacle course. During treadmill locomotion with pseudorandom GVS there was a 12% decrease in coherence between head pitch and vertical translation at the step frequency relative to the no GVS condition, which was not significantly different to the 15% decrease in coherence observed in astronauts following shuttle missions. This disruption in head stabilization likely resulted in a decrease in DVA equivalent to the reduction in acuity observed in astronauts 6 days after return from extended missions aboard the International Space Station (ISS). There were significant increases in time-to-completion of the obstacle course during both pseudorandom (21%) and head-coupled (14%) GVS, equivalent to an ISS astronaut 5 days post-landing. An attempt to suppress head movement was evident during both pseudorandom and head-coupled GVS while negotiating the obstacle course, with a 20 and 16%, decrease in head pitch and yaw velocity, respectively. The results of this study demonstrate that pseudorandom GVS generates many of the salient features of post-flight locomotor dysfunction observed in astronauts following short and long duration missions. An ambulatory GVS system may prove a useful adjunct to the current pre-flight astronaut training regimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16763834     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0528-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  56 in total

1.  The three-dimensional vestibulo-ocular reflex during prolonged microgravity.

Authors:  A H Clarke; J Grigull; R Mueller; H Scherer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  What can posturography tell us about vestibular function?

Authors:  F O Black
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Relative contributions of visual and vestibular information on the trajectory of human gait.

Authors:  Paul M Kennedy; Anthony N Carlsen; J Timothy Inglis; Rudy Chow; Ian M Franks; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Dynamic visual acuity using "far" and "near" targets.

Authors:  Brian T Peters; Jacob J Bloomberg
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  Locomotor head-trunk coordination strategies following space flight.

Authors:  J J Bloomberg; B T Peters; S L Smith; W P Huebner; M F Reschke
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  1997 Mar-Jun       Impact factor: 2.435

6.  European vestibular experiments on the Spacelab-1 mission: 6. Yaw axis vestibulo-ocular reflex.

Authors:  A J Benson; T Viéville
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  European vestibular experiments on the Spacelab-1 mission: 5. Contribution of the otoliths to the vertical vestibulo-ocular reflex.

Authors:  A Berthoz; T Brandt; J Dichgans; T Probst; W Bruzek; T Viéville
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Ocular torsion before and after 1 hour centrifugation.

Authors:  E Groen; B De Graaf; W Bles; J E Bos
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.077

9.  Mechanisms controlling human head stabilization. II. Head-neck characteristics during random rotations in the vertical plane.

Authors:  E A Keshner; R L Cromwell; B W Peterson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Ocular and perceptual responses to linear acceleration in microgravity: alterations in otolith function on the COSMOS and Neurolab flights.

Authors:  Steven T Moore; Gilles Clément; Mingjai Dai; Theodore Raphan; David Solomon; Bernard Cohen
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.435

View more
  18 in total

1.  Effects of Galvanic vestibular stimulation on cognitive function.

Authors:  Valentina Dilda; Hamish G MacDougall; Ian S Curthoys; Steven T Moore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Controlling motion sickness and spatial disorientation and enhancing vestibular rehabilitation with a user-worn see-through display.

Authors:  Wesley W O Krueger
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Improving balance function using vestibular stochastic resonance: optimizing stimulus characteristics.

Authors:  Ajitkumar P Mulavara; Matthew J Fiedler; Igor S Kofman; Scott J Wood; Jorge M Serrador; Brian Peters; Helen S Cohen; Millard F Reschke; Jacob J Bloomberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Interaction of brain areas of visual and vestibular simultaneous activity with fMRI.

Authors:  Hellen M Della-Justina; Humberto R Gamba; Katerina Lukasova; Mariana P Nucci-da-Silva; Anderson M Winkler; Edson Amaro
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Posturography and locomotor tests of dynamic balance after long-duration spaceflight.

Authors:  Helen S Cohen; Kay T Kimball; Ajitkumar P Mulavara; Jacob J Bloomberg; William H Paloski
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.435

6.  Critical features of training that facilitate adaptive generalization of over ground locomotion.

Authors:  Ajitkumar P Mulavara; Helen S Cohen; Jacob J Bloomberg
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2008-10-05       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  Frequency response of human vestibular reflexes characterized by stochastic stimuli.

Authors:  Christopher J Dakin; Gregory M Lee Son; J Timothy Inglis; Jean-Sébastien Blouin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Calibrating balance perturbation using electrical stimulation of the vestibular system.

Authors:  R Goel; M J Rosenberg; H S Cohen; J J Bloomberg; A P Mulavara
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Usefulness of some current balance tests for identifying individuals with disequilibrium due to vestibular impairments.

Authors:  Helen S Cohen; Kay T Kimball
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.435

10.  Pre-adaptation to noisy Galvanic vestibular stimulation is associated with enhanced sensorimotor performance in novel vestibular environments.

Authors:  Steven T Moore; Valentina Dilda; Tiffany R Morris; Don A Yungher; Hamish G MacDougall
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.