Literature DB >> 11521154

Effects of head immobilization on the coordination and control of head and body reorientation and translation during steering.

M A Hollands1, K L Sorensen, A E Patla.   

Abstract

Changing the direction of locomotion involves lateral translation of the body in addition to body reorientation to align with the new travel direction. We designed this study to investigate the CNS control of these postural adjustments. The specific aims of the study were: first, to test the hypothesis that anticipatory head movements towards the new travel path are proactively controlled by the CNS to provide a stable frame of reference for body reorientation and, second, to investigate the relative contribution of foot placement and other mechanisms to the control of lateral body translation during steering. We achieved these aims by carrying out a comprehensive biomechanical analysis of participants performing a steering paradigm and observing the effects of immobilizing the head (by fixing it to the trunk) on postural control and the sequencing of body segment reorientation. Participants performed a task whereby they were visually cued to change their direction of walking by 30 degrees or 60 degrees, left or right, at the midpoint of a 9-m path. The temporal sequence of body reorientation was consistent with previous findings that the head starts to turn in the direction of travel before the rest of the body. Translation of the centre of mass (COM) in the new travel direction was achieved both through alternate placement of the contralateral foot prior to the turn step and use of a hip strategy to control the body pendulum during swing. Immobilizing the head resulted in the following significant changes: earlier onset of trunk yaw with respect to cue delivery, later trunk roll onset and a reduction in trunk roll amplitude. These results provide valuable information regarding the biomechanics of steering and support the hypothesis that aligning the head with motor or locomotor goals using vision provides the CNS with a stable frame of reference, independent of gaze, that can be used to control the repositioning of the body in space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11521154     DOI: 10.1007/s002210100811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  34 in total

1.  Locomotor adjustments for circumvention of an obstacle in the travel path.

Authors:  Lori Ann Vallis; Bradford J McFadyen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Expected and unexpected head yaw movements result in different modifications of gait and whole body coordination strategies.

Authors:  Lori Ann Vallis; Aftab E Patla
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-05-14       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Age-related kinematic changes in late visual-cueing during obstacle circumvention.

Authors:  Maxime R Paquette; Lori Ann Vallis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Postural responses and spatial orientation to neck proprioceptive and vestibular inputs during locomotion in young and older adults.

Authors:  Nandini Deshpande; Aftab E Patla
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-11       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Head control strategies during whole-body turns.

Authors:  David Solomon; R Adam Jenkins; John Jewell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Coordinated modulation of locomotor muscle synergies constructs straight-ahead and curvilinear walking in humans.

Authors:  Grégoire Courtine; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Walking along curved paths of different angles: the relationship between head and trunk turning.

Authors:  Manish N Sreenivasa; Ilja Frissen; Jan L Souman; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Aging affects the ability to use optic flow in the control of heading during locomotion.

Authors:  Jessica R Berard; Joyce Fung; Bradford J McFadyen; Anouk Lamontagne
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The effects of constraining eye movements on visually evoked steering responses during walking in a virtual environment.

Authors:  Rebecca Reed-Jones; James Reed-Jones; Lori Ann Vallis; Mark Hollands
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Age-related differences in visual sampling requirements during adaptive locomotion.

Authors:  Graham John Chapman; Mark Andrew Hollands
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.