Literature DB >> 17091302

Changing lanes: inertial cues and explicit path information facilitate steering performance when visual feedback is removed.

Kristen L Macuga1, Andrew C Beall, Jonathan W Kelly, Roy S Smith, Jack M Loomis.   

Abstract

Can driver steering behaviors, such as a lane change, be executed without visual feedback? In a recent study with a fixed-base driving simulator, drivers failed to execute the return phase of a lane change when steering without vision, resulting in systematic final heading errors biased in the direction of the lane change. Here we challenge the generality of that finding. Suppose that, when asked to perform a lane (position) change, drivers fail to recognize that a heading change is required to make a lateral position change. However, given an explicit path, the necessary heading changes become apparent. Here we demonstrate that when heading requirements are made explicit, drivers appropriately implement the return phase. More importantly, by using an electric vehicle outfitted with a portable virtual reality system, we also show that valid inertial information (i.e., vestibular and somatosensory cues) enables accurate steering behavior when vision is absent. Thus, the failure to properly execute a lane change in a driving simulator without a moving base does not present a fundamental problem for feed-forward driving behavior.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17091302     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0718-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  16 in total

1.  From vision to action: experiments and models of steering control during driving.

Authors:  E C Hildreth; J M Beusmans; E R Boer; C S Royden
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Effects of galvanic vestibular stimulation during human walking.

Authors:  R C Fitzpatrick; D L Wardman; J L Taylor
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Visuo-vestibular interaction in the reconstruction of travelled trajectories.

Authors:  R J V Bertin; A Berthoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Evaluating perception in driving simulation experiments.

Authors:  Andras Kemeny; Francesco Panerai
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  A two-point visual control model of steering.

Authors:  Dario D Salvucci; Rob Gray
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Guidance of locomotion on foot uses perceived target location rather than optic flow.

Authors:  S K Rushton; J M Harris; M R Lloyd; J P Wann
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1998-10-22       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Vehicle control during curve driving.

Authors:  H Godthelp
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 2.888

8.  Precognitive control: open- and closed-loop steering in a lane-change manoeuvre.

Authors:  J Godthelp
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Identifying visual-vestibular contributions during target-directed locomotion.

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Paul M Kennedy; Ken G Anderson; Erin K Cressman; Paul Nagelkerke; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Dynamic visual-vestibular integration during goal directed human locomotion.

Authors:  Nandini Deshpande; Aftab E Patla
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  6 in total

1.  Limitations of feedforward control in multiple-phase steering movements.

Authors:  Steven R Cloete; Guy Wallis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Visuomotor control of steering: the artefact of the matter.

Authors:  Steven Cloete; Guy Wallis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  When flow is not enough: evidence from a lane changing task.

Authors:  Xin Xu; Guy Wallis
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-08-07

4.  Novel measure of driver and vehicle interaction demonstrates transient changes related to alerting.

Authors:  Justin R Brooks; Scott E Kerick; Kaleb McDowell
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  The effect of varying levels of vehicle automation on drivers' lane changing behaviour.

Authors:  Ruth Madigan; Tyron Louw; Natasha Merat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Understanding Immersivity: Image Generation and Transformation Processes in 3D Immersive Environments.

Authors:  Maria Kozhevnikov; Rupali P Dhond
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.