Literature DB >> 9762962

Reciprocal inhibitory visual-vestibular interaction. Visual motion stimulation deactivates the parieto-insular vestibular cortex.

T Brandt1, P Bartenstein, A Janek, M Dieterich.   

Abstract

The vestibular system--a sensor of head accelerations--cannot detect self-motion at constant velocity and thus requires supplementary visual information. The perception of self-motion during constant velocity movement is completely dependent on visually induced vection. This can be linear vection or circular vection (CV). CV is induced by large-field visual motion stimulation during which the stationary subject perceives the moving surroundings as being stable and himself as being moved. To determine the unknown cortical visual-vestibular interaction during CV, we conducted a PET activation study on CV in 10 human volunteers. The PET images of cortical areas activated during visual motion stimulation without CV were compared with those with CV. Hitherto, CV was explained neurophysiologically by visual-vestibular convergence with activation of the vestibular nuclei, thalamic subnuclei and vestibular cortex. If CV were mediated by the vestibular cortex, one would expect that an adequate visual motion stimulus would activate both the visual and vestibular cortex. Contrary to this expectation, it was shown for the first time that visual motion stimulation with CV not only activates a medial parieto-occipital visual area bilaterally, separate from middle temporal/medial superior temporal areas, it also simultaneously deactivates the parieto-insular vestibular cortex. There was a positive correlation between the perceived intensity of CV and relative changes in regional CBF in parietal and occipital areas. These findings support a new functional interpretation: reciprocal inhibitory visual-vestibular interaction as a multisensory mechanism for self-motion perception. Inhibitory visual-vestibular interaction might protect visual perception of self-motion from potential vestibular mismatches caused by involuntary head accelerations during locomotion, and this would allow the dominant sensorial weight during self-motion perception to shift from one sensory modality to the other.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9762962     DOI: 10.1093/brain/121.9.1749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  114 in total

1.  Sensory system interactions during simultaneous vestibular and visual stimulation in PET.

Authors:  Angela Deutschländer; Sandra Bense; Thomas Stephan; Markus Schwaiger; Thomas Brandt; Marianne Dieterich
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Visuo-vestibular interaction in the reconstruction of travelled trajectories.

Authors:  R J V Bertin; A Berthoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Hemodynamic evoked response of the sensorimotor cortex measured noninvasively with near-infrared optical imaging.

Authors:  Maria Angela Franceschini; Sergio Fantini; John H Thompson; Joseph P Culver; David A Boas
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Rollvection versus linearvection: comparison of brain activations in PET.

Authors:  Angela Deutschländer; Sandra Bense; Thomas Stephan; Markus Schwaiger; Marianne Dieterich; Thomas Brandt
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  The insula: anatomic study and MR imaging display at 1.5 T.

Authors:  Thomas P Naidich; Eugene Kang; Girish M Fatterpekar; Bradley N Delman; S Humayun Gultekin; David Wolfe; Orlando Ortiz; Indra Yousry; Martin Weismann; Tarek A Yousry
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Vection can be induced in the absence of explicit motion stimuli.

Authors:  Takeharu Seno; Hiroyuki Ito; Shoji Sunaga
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Electrical tongue stimulation normalizes activity within the motion-sensitive brain network in balance-impaired subjects as revealed by group independent component analysis.

Authors:  Joseph C Wildenberg; Mitchell E Tyler; Yuri P Danilov; Kurt A Kaczmarek; Mary E Meyerand
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2011-09-12

8.  Convergence of vestibular and visual self-motion signals in an area of the posterior sylvian fissure.

Authors:  Aihua Chen; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Adaptation to heading direction dissociates the roles of human MST and V6 in the processing of optic flow.

Authors:  Velia Cardin; Lara Hemsworth; Andrew T Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  Electrical stimulation of cranial nerves in cognition and disease.

Authors:  Devin Adair; Dennis Truong; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Nigel Gebodh; Helen Borges; Libby Ho; J Douglas Bremner; Bashar W Badran; Vitaly Napadow; Vincent P Clark; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-02-23       Impact factor: 8.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.