Literature DB >> 16028588

Gaze behavior in analytical and holistic face processing.

Gudrun Schwarzer1, Susanne Huber, Thomas Dümmler.   

Abstract

We conducted two experiments examining children's and adults' gaze behavior when processing faces analytically (focusing on a single feature) or holistically (comparing the overall similarity of the faces). Children 6-8 and 9-10 years of age and adults were instructed to assign schematically drawn faces in Experiment 1 and photos of real faces in Experiment 2 to two categories. The categories were constructed so as to allow either an analytical or holistic categorization of the faces. During all trials, gaze behavior was recorded from stimulus onset until reaction. The location and duration of the fixations used were analyzed. Whereas the holistic processors fixated the whole area of the eyes and nose most and longest independently of age, analytical processors showed a more feature-specific gaze behavior, focusing their fixations upon the particular feature used for subsequent processing. Thus, differences in analytical and holistic face processing can be detected early in gaze behavior-that is, at the visual encoding stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16028588     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  26 in total

1.  When inverted faces are recognized: the role of configural information in face recognition.

Authors:  H Leder; V Bruce
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2000-05

2.  Evoked potential evidence for human brain mechanisms that respond to single, fixated faces.

Authors:  D A Jeffreys; E S Tukmachi; G Rockley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: direct evidence.

Authors:  A Freire; K Lee; L A Symons
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Configurational information in face perception.

Authors:  A W Young; D Hellawell; D C Hay
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  What causes the face inversion effect?

Authors:  M J Farah; J W Tanaka; H M Drain
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Gaze motor asymmetries in the perception of faces during a memory task.

Authors:  I Mertens; H Siegmund; O J Grüsser
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Eyes as the center of focus in the visual examination of human faces.

Authors:  S W Janik; A R Wellens; M L Goldberg; L F Dell'Osso
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1978-12

8.  Comparison of eye-movement patterns in schizophrenic and normal adults during examination of facial affect displays.

Authors:  T Shimizu; A Shimizu; K Yamashita; M Iwase; O Kajimoto; T Kawasaki
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2000-12

9.  Gaze behavior of children with pervasive developmental disorder toward human faces: a fixation time study.

Authors:  J N van der Geest; C Kemner; M N Verbaten; H van Engeland
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 8.982

10.  What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition.

Authors:  M Moscovitch; G Winocur; M Behrmann
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  15 in total

1.  Gaze behaviour in hereditary prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Gudrun Schwarzer; Susanne Huber; Martina Grüter; Thomas Grüter; Cornelia Gross; Melanie Hipfel; Ingo Kennerknecht
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-06-10

2.  Gaze patterns during identity and emotion judgments in hearing adults and deaf users of American Sign Language.

Authors:  Susan M Letourneau; Teresa V Mitchell
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Behavioral and neural evidence of increased attention to the bottom half of the face in deaf signers.

Authors:  Teresa V Mitchell; Susan M Letourneau; Melissa C T Maslin
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.406

4.  Impaired holistic processing in congenital prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Galia Avidan; Michal Tanzer; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Elevated amygdala response to faces and gaze aversion in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Nim Tottenham; Margaret E Hertzig; Kristen Gillespie-Lynch; Tara Gilhooly; Alexander J Millner; B J Casey
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Deficits in cross-race face learning: insights from eye movements and pupillometry.

Authors:  Stephen D Goldinger; Yi He; Megan H Papesh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Developmental Changes in Natural Viewing Behavior: Bottom-Up and Top-Down Differences between Children, Young Adults and Older Adults.

Authors:  Alper Açık; Adjmal Sarwary; Rafael Schultze-Kraft; Selim Onat; Peter König
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-11-25

8.  Restricted Visual Scanpaths During Emotion Recognition in Childhood Social Anxiety Disorder.

Authors:  Johan Lundin Kleberg; Emilie Bäcklin Löwenberg; Jennifer Y F Lau; Eva Serlachius; Jens Högström
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.157

9.  Category Processing and the human likeness dimension of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis: Eye-Tracking Data.

Authors:  Marcus Cheetham; Ivana Pavlovic; Nicola Jordan; Pascal Suter; Lutz Jancke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-03-07

10.  Developmental changes in face visual scanning in autism spectrum disorder as assessed by data-based analysis.

Authors:  Anouck Amestoy; Etienne Guillaud; Manuel P Bouvard; Jean-René Cazalets
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.