Literature DB >> 8232855

Gaze motor asymmetries in the perception of faces during a memory task.

I Mertens1, H Siegmund, O J Grüsser.   

Abstract

In 33 male and female adult volunteers, eye position recordings were performed by means of an infrared reflection technique. Slides of randomly shuffled black-and-white photographs (7.5 x 10 degrees) of faces and vases were projected for 6 or 20 sec respectively in a visual memory task. In each series, 10 slides of art nouveau vases and of the "inner part" of masked Caucasian faces were used. During recording the head was fixed by a bite-board. (a) For faces the preferred targets of the centre of gaze were the eyes, the mouth and nose region, for vases the contours and some prominent ornaments. (b) Left-right asymmetries in the gaze-movement sampling strategy appeared with faces, but not with vases. In faces, the overall time that the centre of gaze remained in the left half of the field of gaze was significantly longer than in the right half. (c) When, however, the amplitude of the gaze excursions into the left and right halves of the inspected items was taken as a measure and normalized, a preference for the right gaze field was observed. (d) The relative left-right bias during face inspection was stronger with the 6 sec than with the 20 sec inspection period and significantly stronger in female than in male subjects for the 6 sec tasks. (e) Left/right inversion of the face stimuli did not abolish the side bias. Thus the asymmetric sampling strategy when faces were inspected as compared to vases was due to "internal" factors on the part of the subjects. It is hypothesized that a left-right asymmetry in hemispheric visual data processing for face stimuli was the cause of a left-right asymmetry in gaze motor strategies when faces were inspected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8232855     DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(93)90154-r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  34 in total

1.  Initial eye movements during face identification are optimal and similar across cultures.

Authors:  Charles C-F Or; Matthew F Peterson; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 2.  Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences.

Authors:  Alexandra Frischen; Andrew P Bayliss; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  [Facial aesthetics part I - the significance of the triangle of yarbus].

Authors:  Ingo N Springer; Oliver Zernial; Jörg Wiltfang; Patrick H Warnke; Hendrik Terheyden; Stefan Wolfart
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2007-08

4.  Electrophysiological correlates of spatial orienting towards angry faces: a source localization study.

Authors:  Diane L Santesso; Alicia E Meuret; Stefan G Hofmann; Erik M Mueller; Kyle G Ratner; Etienne B Roesch; Diego A Pizzagalli
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  The face inversion effect is not a consequence of aberrant eye movements.

Authors:  Carrick C Williams; John M Henderson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-12

6.  Natural, but not artificial, facial movements elicit the left visual field bias in infant face scanning.

Authors:  Naiqi G Xiao; Paul C Quinn; Andrea Wheeler; Olivier Pascalis; Kang Lee
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Rightward and leftward biases in temporal reproduction of objects represented in central and peripheral spaces.

Authors:  Eve A Isham; Cong-Huy Le; Arne D Ekstrom
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.877

8.  Consistent left gaze bias in processing different facial cues.

Authors:  Kun Guo; Claire Smith; Kathryn Powell; Kelly Nicholls
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-05-11

9.  Scan patterns during the processing of facial identity in prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Jason J S Barton; Nathan Radcliffe; Mariya V Cherkasova; Jay A Edelman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Evaluation of the facial dimensions of young adult women with a preferred facial appearance.

Authors:  Sae Yong Kim; Mohamed Bayome; Jae Hyun Park; Yoon-Ah Kook; Ju Hee Kang; Kang Hyuk Kim; Hong-Beom Moon
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 1.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.