Literature DB >> 16024350

Red deer stags use formants as assessment cues during intrasexual agonistic interactions.

David Reby1, Karen McComb, Bruno Cargnelutti, Chris Darwin, W Tecumseh Fitch, Tim Clutton-Brock.   

Abstract

While vocal tract resonances or formants are key acoustic parameters that define differences between phonemes in human speech, little is known about their function in animal communication. Here, we used playback experiments to present red deer stags with re-synthesized vocalizations in which formant frequencies were systematically altered to simulate callers of different body sizes. In response to stimuli where lower formants indicated callers with longer vocal tracts, stags were more attentive, replied with more roars and extended their vocal tracts further in these replies. Our results indicate that mammals other than humans use formants in vital vocal exchanges and can adjust their own formant frequencies in relation to those that they hear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16024350      PMCID: PMC1564087          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2954

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  10 in total

1.  The evolution of speech: a comparative review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Rhesus macaques spontaneously perceive formants in conspecific vocalizations.

Authors:  W Tecumseh Fitch; Jonathan B Fritz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The acoustic features of vowel-like grunt calls in chacma baboons (Papio cyncephalus ursinus): implications for production processes and functions.

Authors:  M J Owren; R M Seyfarth; D L Cheney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The descended larynx is not uniquely human.

Authors:  W T Fitch; D Reby
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Vocal tract length and formant frequency dispersion correlate with body size in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  W T Fitch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Roaring by red deer stags advances the date of oestrus in hinds.

Authors:  K McComb
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Dec 17-23       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Hyoid apparatus and pharynx in the lion (Panthera leo), jaguar (Panthera onca), tiger (Panthera tigris), cheetah (Acinonyxjubatus) and domestic cat (Felis silvestris f. catus).

Authors:  G E Weissengruber; G Forstenpointner; G Peters; A Kübber-Heiss; W T Fitch
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Acoustic correlates of caller identity and affect intensity in the vowel-like grunt vocalizations of baboons.

Authors:  Drew Rendall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Vocal tract limitations on the vowel repertoires of rhesus monkey and other nonhuman primates.

Authors:  P H Lieberman; D H Klatt; W H Wilson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-06-06       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Vocal tract length and acoustics of vocalization in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris).

Authors:  T Riede; T Fitch
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.312

  10 in total
  78 in total

1.  Vocal anatomy, tongue protrusion behaviour and the acoustics of rutting roars in free-ranging Iberian red deer stags (Cervus elaphus hispanicus).

Authors:  Roland Frey; Ilya Volodin; Elena Volodina; Juan Carranza; Jerónimo Torres-Porras
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Oestrous red deer hinds prefer male roars with higher fundamental frequencies.

Authors:  David Reby; Benjamin D Charlton; Yann Locatelli; Karen McComb
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  A nose that roars: anatomical specializations and behavioural features of rutting male saiga.

Authors:  Roland Frey; Ilya Volodin; Elena Volodina
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Swamp sparrows modulate vocal performance in an aggressive context.

Authors:  Adrienne L DuBois; Stephen Nowicki; William A Searcy
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Vocal fundamental and formant frequencies are honest signals of threat potential in peripubertal males.

Authors:  Carolyn R Hodges-Simeon; Michael Gurven; David A Puts; Steven J C Gaulin
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 2.671

6.  Zebra finches exhibit speaker-independent phonetic perception of human speech.

Authors:  Verena R Ohms; Arike Gill; Caroline A A Van Heijningen; Gabriel J L Beckers; Carel ten Cate
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Fear conditioned discrimination of frequency modulated sweeps within species-specific calls of mustached bats.

Authors:  Jie Ma; Robert T Naumann; Jagmeet S Kanwal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Quality prevails over identity in the sexually selected vocalisations of an ageing mammal.

Authors:  Elodie Briefer; Elisabetta Vannoni; Alan G McElligott
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 7.431

9.  Chimpanzees extract social information from agonistic screams.

Authors:  Katie E Slocombe; Tanja Kaller; Josep Call; Klaus Zuberbühler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  High-pitched notes during vocal contests signal genetic diversity in ocellated antbirds.

Authors:  Yi-Men Araya-Ajoy; Johel Chaves-Campos; Elisabeth K V Kalko; J Andrew Dewoody
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.