| Literature DB >> 19956580 |
Yi-Men Araya-Ajoy1, Johel Chaves-Campos, Elisabeth K V Kalko, J Andrew Dewoody.
Abstract
Animals use honest signals to assess the quality of competitors during aggressive interactions. Current theory predicts that honest signals should be costly to produce and thus reveal some aspects of the phenotypic or genetic quality of the sender. In songbirds, research indicates that biomechanical constraints make the production of some acoustic features costly. Furthermore, recent studies have found that vocal features are related to genetic diversity. We linked these two lines of research by evaluating if constrained acoustic features reveal male genetic diversity during aggressive interactions in ocellated antbirds (Phaenostictus mcleannani). We recorded the aggressive vocalizations of radiotagged males at La Selva Biological Station in Costa Rica, and found significant variation in the highest frequency produced among individuals. Moreover, we detected a negative relationship between the frequency of the highest pitched note and vocalization duration, suggesting that high pitched notes might constrain the duration of vocalizations through biomechanical and/or energetic limitations. When we experimentally exposed wild radiotagged males to simulated acoustic challenges, the birds increased the pitch of their vocalization. We also found that individuals with higher genetic diversity (as measured by zygosity across 9 microsatellite loci) produced notes of higher pitch during aggressive interactions. Overall, our results suggest that the ability to produce high pitched notes is an honest indicator of male genetic diversity in male-male aggressive interactions.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19956580 PMCID: PMC2779863 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008137
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Annotated spectrogram of the “loud song” of a male ocellated antbird.
Loud song structure was quantified using on-screen cursors to measure the following time and frequency traits: (1) maximum frequency of the first element (Max F. 1st) (2) maximum frequency of center elements (Max F. mid), (3) maximum frequency of the last element (F. last), (4) maximum frequency of the element with highest frequency (Max F. highest), (5) maximum frequency of the element with the lowest frequency (Max F. Lowest), (6) maximum frequency of the entire vocalization (Max F.)*, (7) total bandwidth of the vocalization (bandwidth), (8) vocalization duration (Duration), (9) time elapsed until the element with the highest frequency was produced (Time to Max F Highest )*, (10) time elapsed until the element with the maximum frequency of the entire vocalization was produced (Time to Max F )*, (11) number of elements produced after the element with the highest frequency*. Maximum frequency refers to the frequency with most energy in the element. * Measurements not shown in the annotated spectrogram.
Figure 2Correlation between the frequency of the element with highest pitch and vocalization duration in the “loud song” of ocellated antbirds.
Filled circles show the values of maximum performance for seven 300-Hz bin according to an upper bound regression analysis (see text).
ANOVA results for individual variation in the aggressive vocal features of ocellated antbirds.
| Acoustic feature | F12,79 |
| Max F. 1st (kHz) | 4.52 |
| Max F. last (kHz) | 3.97 |
| Max F. center (kHz) | 7.90 |
| Max F. highest (kHz) | 10.88 |
| Max F. lowest (kHz) | 3.72 |
| Max. F (kHz) | 11.04 |
| Bandwidth (kHz) | 4.84 |
| Duration (kHz) | 5.25 |
| Time to Max F. Highest (s) | 6.13 |
| Time to Max F (s) | 4.18 |
| Number of elements after Max F highest | 4.57 |
See Fig. 1 for definition of acoustic features. All tests were significant (P<0.001 in all cases). Most individuals differed from each other for each acoustic feature according to posthoc Tukey tests.
Variation in acoustic features of ocellated antbirds between loud songs directed towards mates and loud songs elicited by an aggressive acoustic stimulus.
| Mate | Aggressive | Tests | ||||
| Acoustic feature | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | F | P |
| Max F. 1st (kHz) | 2.95 | 0.07 | 3.09 | 0.07 | 5.87 | 0.01 |
| Max F. last (kHz) | 3.16 | 0.07 | 3.07 | 0.06 | 1.28 | 0.26 |
| Max F. center (kHz) | 3.72 | 0.10 | 4.03 | 0.10 | 21.21 | <0.01 |
| Max F. highest (kHz) | 4.55 | 0.10 | 4.8 | 0.90 | 19.88 | <0.01 |
| Max F. lowest (kHz) | 2.68 | 0.07 | 2.66 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 0.67 |
| Max F. (kHz) | 3.69 | 0.10 | 3.9 | 0.09 | 10.27 | <0.01 |
| Bandwidth (kHz) | 1.86 | 0.08 | 2.16 | 0.07 | 20.3 | <0.01 |
| Duration (s) | 3.81 | 0.25 | 4.74 | 0.22 | 19.18 | <0.01 |
| Time to max F. highest (s) | 2.87 | 0.14 | 3.13 | 0.13 | 5.34 | 0.02 |
| Time to max F. (s) | 2.37 | 0.19 | 1.82 | 0.16 | 10.67 | <0.01 |
| Number of elements after max F. highest | 1.24 | 0.36 | 3.04 | 0.3 | 30.13 | <0.01 |
F = ANOVA F statistic; degrees of freedom for each test = 1,105. See Fig. 1 for definition of acoustic features.
Figure 3Correlation between song features with genetic diversity (measured as homozygosity by loci) in ocellated antbirds.
Song features: fundamental frequency of the center element (open circles, solid line) and fundamental frequency of the highest element (filled triangles, dashed line).