Literature DB >> 20427342

Oestrous red deer hinds prefer male roars with higher fundamental frequencies.

David Reby1, Benjamin D Charlton, Yann Locatelli, Karen McComb.   

Abstract

Across vertebrates, the observation that lower-pitched vocalizations are typically associated with larger and/or higher quality males has lead to the widespread belief that inter- and intra-sexual selection will produce male calls with low fundamental frequencies (F0). Here we investigated the response of oestrous red deer hinds to playback of re-synthesized male roars characterized by either higher than average or lower than average F0. We found that hinds prefer higher rather than lower 'pitched' roars, providing, to our knowledge, the first evidence of such a bias in nonhuman mammals. Our findings can be interpreted in relation to previous observations that the minimum F0 of roars is positively correlated with male reproductive success in free-ranging red deer stags, and that across Cervids the F0 of male mating calls shows extreme variability. Females showing preferences for higher-pitched roars might derive genetic benefits through more competitive male offspring. Our results emphasize the need for further investigations of female preferences in mammals in order to better understand the extreme variation of F0 values observed in male sexual calls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20427342      PMCID: PMC2981986          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  22 in total

1.  The relationship between testosterone and vocal frequencies in human males.

Authors:  Sarah Evans; Nick Neave; Delia Wakelin; Colin Hamilton
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-11-29

Review 2.  Control of seasonal reproduction in sheep and goats by light and hormones.

Authors:  J Thimonier
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil Suppl       Date:  1981

3.  Estrus synchronization in dairy goats: use of fluorogestone acetate vaginal sponges or norgestomet ear implants.

Authors:  V J Freitas; G Baril; J Saumande
Journal:  Anim Reprod Sci       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.145

4.  Gonadotrophin-induced follicle development in red deer hinds during the breeding and non-breeding seasons.

Authors:  B J McLeod; L M Meikle; M W Fisher; G H Shackell; D A Heath
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  Men's voices and women's choices.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Vocal tract length and formant frequency dispersion correlate with body size in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  W T Fitch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Pitch (F0) and formant profiles of human vowels and vowel-like baboon grunts: the role of vocalizer body size and voice-acoustic allometry.

Authors:  Drew Rendall; Sophie Kollias; Christina Ney; Peter Lloyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Voice pitch predicts reproductive success in male hunter-gatherers.

Authors:  C L Apicella; D R Feinberg; F W Marlowe
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Voice pitch alters mate-choice-relevant perception in hunter-gatherers.

Authors:  Coren L Apicella; David R Feinberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Acoustic correlates of caller identity and affect intensity in the vowel-like grunt vocalizations of baboons.

Authors:  Drew Rendall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  20 in total

1.  Vocal anatomy, tongue protrusion behaviour and the acoustics of rutting roars in free-ranging Iberian red deer stags (Cervus elaphus hispanicus).

Authors:  Roland Frey; Ilya Volodin; Elena Volodina; Juan Carranza; Jerónimo Torres-Porras
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Response of red deer stags (Cervus elaphus) to playback of harsh versus common roars.

Authors:  Maxime Garcia; Megan T Wyman; Benjamin D Charlton; W Tecumseh Fitch; David Reby
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2014-08-14

3.  Descended and mobile larynx, vocal tract elongation and rutting roars in male goitred gazelles (Gazella subgutturosa Güldenstaedt, 1780).

Authors:  Roland Frey; Ilya Volodin; Elena Volodina; Natalia V Soldatova; Erkin T Juldaschev
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  The anatomy of vocal divergence in North American Elk and European red deer.

Authors:  Roland Frey; Tobias Riede
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 1.804

5.  Variability of female responses to conspecific vs. heterospecific male mating calls in polygynous deer: an open door to hybridization?

Authors:  Megan T Wyman; Benjamin D Charlton; Yann Locatelli; David Reby
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Roars, groans and moans: Anatomical correlates of vocal diversity in polygynous deer.

Authors:  Roland Frey; Megan Tompkins Wyman; Malcolm Johnston; Michael Schofield; Yann Locatelli; David Reby
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Roaring high and low: composition and possible functions of the Iberian stag's vocal repertoire.

Authors:  Daniela Passilongo; David Reby; Juan Carranza; Marco Apollonio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Density can be misleading for low-density species: benefits of passive acoustic monitoring.

Authors:  Tracey L Rogers; Michaela B Ciaglia; Holger Klinck; Colin Southwell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Testosterone and reproductive effort in male primates.

Authors:  Martin N Muller
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 3.492

10.  The relationship between testosterone and long-distance calling in wild male chimpanzees.

Authors:  Pawel Fedurek; Katie E Slocombe; Drew K Enigk; Melissa Emery Thompson; Richard W Wrangham; Martin N Muller
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.944

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.