Literature DB >> 12822809

Acoustic correlates of caller identity and affect intensity in the vowel-like grunt vocalizations of baboons.

Drew Rendall1.   

Abstract

Comparative, production-based research on animal vocalizations can allow assessments of continuity in vocal communication processes across species, including humans, and may aid in the development of general frameworks relating specific constitutional attributes of callers to acoustic-structural details of their vocal output. Analyses were undertaken on vowel-like baboon grunts to examine variation attributable to caller identity and the intensity of the affective state underlying call production. Six hundred six grunts from eight adult females were analyzed. Grunts derived from 128 bouts of calling in two behavioral contexts: concerted group movements and social interactions involving mothers and their young infants. Each context was subdivided into a high- and low-arousal condition. Thirteen acoustic features variously predicted to reflect variation in either caller identity or arousal intensity were measured for each grunt bout, including tempo-, source- and filter-related features. Grunt bouts were highly individually distinctive, differing in a variety of acoustic dimensions but with some indication that filter-related features contributed disproportionately to individual distinctiveness. In contrast, variation according to arousal condition was associated primarily with tempo- and source-related features, many matching those identified as vehicles of affect expression in other nonhuman primate species and in human speech and other nonverbal vocal signals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12822809     DOI: 10.1121/1.1568942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  66 in total

1.  Oestrous red deer hinds prefer male roars with higher fundamental frequencies.

Authors:  David Reby; Benjamin D Charlton; Yann Locatelli; Karen McComb
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Do age- and sex-related variations reliably reflect body size in non-human primate vocalizations? A review.

Authors:  E Ey; D Pfefferle; J Fischer
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 2.163

3.  Evidence for a perception of prosodic cues in bat communication: contact call classification by Megaderma lyra.

Authors:  Simone Janssen; Sabine Schmidt
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Primate auditory recognition memory performance varies with sound type.

Authors:  Chi-Wing Ng; Bethany Plakke; Amy Poremba
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Hearing others' pain: neural activity related to empathy.

Authors:  Simone Lang; Tao Yu; Alexandra Markl; Friedemann Müller; Boris Kotchoubey
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Arousal dynamics drive vocal production in marmoset monkeys.

Authors:  Jeremy I Borjon; Daniel Y Takahashi; Diego C Cervantes; Asif A Ghazanfar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Five mechanisms of sound symbolic association.

Authors:  David M Sidhu; Penny M Pexman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

8.  Bee threat elicits alarm call in African elephants.

Authors:  Lucy E King; Joseph Soltis; Iain Douglas-Hamilton; Anne Savage; Fritz Vollrath
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Quality prevails over identity in the sexually selected vocalisations of an ageing mammal.

Authors:  Elodie Briefer; Elisabetta Vannoni; Alan G McElligott
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 7.431

10.  Asymmetries in the individual distinctiveness and maternal recognition of infant contact calls and distress screams in baboons.

Authors:  Drew Rendall; Hugh Notman; Michael J Owren
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.