Literature DB >> 19087921

Swamp sparrows modulate vocal performance in an aggressive context.

Adrienne L DuBois1, Stephen Nowicki, William A Searcy.   

Abstract

Vocal performance refers to the proficiency with which a bird sings songs that are challenging to produce, and can be measured in simple trilled songs by their deviation from an upper bound regression of frequency bandwidth on trill rate. Here, we show that male swamp sparrows (Melospiza georgiana) increase the vocal performance of individual song types in aggressive contexts by increasing both the trill rate and frequency bandwidth. These results are the first to demonstrate flexible modulation by songbirds of this aspect of vocal performance and are consistent with this signal feature having a role in aggressive communication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19087921      PMCID: PMC2665810          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  3 in total

1.  Vocal performance influences male receiver response in the banded wren.

Authors:  Anya E Illes; Michelle L Hall; Sandra L Vehrencamp
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Red deer stags use formants as assessment cues during intrasexual agonistic interactions.

Authors:  David Reby; Karen McComb; Bruno Cargnelutti; Chris Darwin; W Tecumseh Fitch; Tim Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Kinematics of birdsong: functional correlation of cranial movements and acoustic features in sparrows.

Authors:  M W Westneat; J H Long; W Hoese; S Nowicki
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.312

  3 in total
  22 in total

1.  Female Lincoln's sparrows modulate their behavior in response to variation in male song quality.

Authors:  Samuel P Caro; Kendra B Sewall; Katrina G Salvante; Keith W Sockman
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 2.671

2.  Responses to song playback vary with the vocal performance of both signal senders and receivers.

Authors:  Dana L Moseley; David C Lahti; Jeffrey Podos
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Songs of Darwin's finches diverge when a new species enters the community.

Authors:  B Rosemary Grant; Peter R Grant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Persistent representation of juvenile experience in the adult songbird brain.

Authors:  Jonathan F Prather; Susan Peters; Stephen Nowicki; Richard Mooney
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Song environment affects singing effort and vasotocin immunoreactivity in the forebrain of male Lincoln's sparrows.

Authors:  Kendra B Sewall; Elyse C Dankoski; Keith W Sockman
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 3.587

6.  Trill performance components vary with age, season, and motivation in the banded wren.

Authors:  S L Vehrencamp; J Yantachka; M L Hall; S R de Kort
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Fluctuations in neighbourhood fertility generate variable signalling effort.

Authors:  Conor C Taff; Gail L Patricelli; Corey R Freeman-Gallant
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Evolution of advertisement calls in African clawed frogs.

Authors:  Martha L Tobias; Ben J Evans; Darcy B Kelley
Journal:  Behaviour       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.991

9.  High-pitched notes during vocal contests signal genetic diversity in ocellated antbirds.

Authors:  Yi-Men Araya-Ajoy; Johel Chaves-Campos; Elisabeth K V Kalko; J Andrew Dewoody
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Females alter their song when challenged in a sex-role reversed bird species.

Authors:  Nicole Geberzahn; Wolfgang Goymann; Christina Muck; Carel Ten Cate
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.