Literature DB >> 14498802

Female condition influences preferences for sexual dimorphism in faces of male humans (Homo sapiens).

I S Penton-Voak1, A C Little, B C Jones, D M Burt, B P Tiddeman, D I Perrett.   

Abstract

In some species, female condition correlates positively with preferences for male secondary sexual traits. Women's preferences for sexually dimorphic characteristics in male faces (facial masculinity) have recently been reported to covary with self-reported attractiveness. As women's attractiveness has been proposed to signal reproductive condition, the findings in human (Homo sapiens) and other species may reflect similar processes. The current study investigated whether the covariation between condition and preferences for masculinity would generalize to 2 further measures of female attractiveness: other-rated facial attractiveness and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR). Women with high (unattractive) WHR and/or relatively low other-rated facial attractiveness preferred more "feminine" male faces when choosing faces for a long-term relationship than when choosing for a short-term relationship, possibly reflecting diverse tactics in female mate choice. Copyright 2003 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14498802     DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.117.3.264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  29 in total

1.  Reproductive strategy, sexual development and attraction to facial characteristics.

Authors:  R Elisabeth Cornwell; Miriam J Law Smith; Lynda G Boothroyd; Fhionna R Moore; Hasker P Davis; Michael Stirrat; Bernard Tiddeman; David I Perrett
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Correlated preferences for facial masculinity and ideal or actual partner's masculinity.

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine; Benedict C Jones; Anthony C Little; Lynda G Boothroyd; David I Perrett; Ian S Penton-Voak; Philip A Cooper; Lars Penke; David R Feinberg; Bernard P Tiddeman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Facial and bodily correlates of family background.

Authors:  Lynda G Boothroyd; David I Perrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Life history of female preferences for male faces: a comparison of pubescent girls, nonpregnant and pregnant young women, and middle-aged women.

Authors:  Krzysztof Kościński
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2011-12

6.  I only have eyes for you: Ovulation redirects attention (but not memory) to attractive men.

Authors:  Uriah S Anderson; Elaine F Perea; D Vaughn Becker; Joshua M Ackerman; Jenessa R Shapiro; Steven L Neuberg; Douglas T Kenrick
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2010-09

7.  Effects of stress on human mating preferences: stressed individuals prefer dissimilar mates.

Authors:  Johanna Lass-Hennemann; Christian E Deuter; Linn K Kuehl; André Schulz; Terry D Blumenthal; Hartmut Schachinger
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The Relative Importance of Sexual Dimorphism, Fluctuating Asymmetry, and Color Cues to Health during Evaluation of Potential Partners' Facial Photographs : A Conjoint Analysis Study.

Authors:  Justin K Mogilski; Lisa L M Welling
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2017-03

9.  Optimal waist-to-hip ratios in women activate neural reward centers in men.

Authors:  Steven M Platek; Devendra Singh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Testosterone responses to competition in men are related to facial masculinity.

Authors:  Nicholas Pound; Ian S Penton-Voak; Alison K Surridge
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.