Taoran Cui1, G Wilson Miller2, John P Mugler2, Gordon D Cates2, Jaime F Mata2, Eduard E de Lange2, Qijie Huang3, Talissa A Altes4, Fang-Fang Yin5, Jing Cai5,6. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA. 2. Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA. 3. Department of Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, Missouri, 65212, USA. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. 6. Department of Health Technology and Informatics, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Deformable image registration (DIR)-based lung ventilation mapping is attractive due to its simplicity, and also challenging due to its susceptibility to errors and uncertainties. In this study, we explored the use of 3D Hyperpolarized (HP) gas tagging MRI to evaluate DIR-based lung ventilation. METHOD AND MATERIAL: Three healthy volunteers included in this study underwent both 3D HP gas tagging MRI (t-MRI) and 3D proton MRI (p-MRI) using balanced steady-state free precession pulse sequence at end of inhalation and end of exhalation. We first obtained the reference displacement vector fields (DVFs) from the t-MRIs by tracking the motion of each tagging grid between the exhalation and the inhalation phases. Then, we determined DIR-based DVFs from the p-MRIs by registering the images at the two phases with two commercial DIR algorithms. Lung ventilations were calculated from both the reference DVFs and the DIR-based DVFs using the Jacobian method and then compared using cross correlation and mutual information. RESULTS: The DIR-based lung ventilations calculated using p-MRI varied considerably from the reference lung ventilations based on t-MRI among all three subjects. The lung ventilations generated using Velocity AI were preferable for the better spatial homogeneity and accuracy compared to the ones using MIM, with higher average cross correlation (0.328 vs 0.262) and larger average mutual information (0.528 vs 0.323). CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that different DIR algorithms resulted in different lung ventilation maps due to underlining differences in the DVFs. HP gas tagging MRI provides a unique platform for evaluating DIR-based lung ventilation.
BACKGROUND: Deformable image registration (DIR)-based lung ventilation mapping is attractive due to its simplicity, and also challenging due to its susceptibility to errors and uncertainties. In this study, we explored the use of 3D Hyperpolarized (HP) gas tagging MRI to evaluate DIR-based lung ventilation. METHOD AND MATERIAL: Three healthy volunteers included in this study underwent both 3D HP gas tagging MRI (t-MRI) and 3D proton MRI (p-MRI) using balanced steady-state free precession pulse sequence at end of inhalation and end of exhalation. We first obtained the reference displacement vector fields (DVFs) from the t-MRIs by tracking the motion of each tagging grid between the exhalation and the inhalation phases. Then, we determined DIR-based DVFs from the p-MRIs by registering the images at the two phases with two commercial DIR algorithms. Lung ventilations were calculated from both the reference DVFs and the DIR-based DVFs using the Jacobian method and then compared using cross correlation and mutual information. RESULTS: The DIR-based lung ventilations calculated using p-MRI varied considerably from the reference lung ventilations based on t-MRI among all three subjects. The lung ventilations generated using Velocity AI were preferable for the better spatial homogeneity and accuracy compared to the ones using MIM, with higher average cross correlation (0.328 vs 0.262) and larger average mutual information (0.528 vs 0.323). CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that different DIR algorithms resulted in different lung ventilation maps due to underlining differences in the DVFs. HP gas tagging MRI provides a unique platform for evaluating DIR-based lung ventilation.
Authors: J Cai; T A Altes; G W Miller; K Sheng; P W Read; J F Mata; X Zhong; G D Cates; E E de Lange; J P Mugler; J R Brookeman Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Rojano Kashani; Martina Hub; James M Balter; Marc L Kessler; Lei Dong; Lifei Zhang; Lei Xing; Yaoqin Xie; David Hawkes; Julia A Schnabel; Jamie McClelland; Sarang Joshi; Quan Chen; Weiguo Lu Journal: Med Phys Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Joseph M Reinhardt; Kai Ding; Kunlin Cao; Gary E Christensen; Eric A Hoffman; Shalmali V Bodas Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2008-04-12 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: W Paul Segars; David S Lalush; Eric C Frey; Dinesh Manocha; Michael A King; Benjamin M W Tsui Journal: IEEE Trans Nucl Sci Date: 2009-10-01 Impact factor: 1.679
Authors: Daniel A Low; Michelle Nystrom; Eugene Kalinin; Parag Parikh; James F Dempsey; Jeffrey D Bradley; Sasa Mutic; Sasha H Wahab; Tareque Islam; Gary Christensen; David G Politte; Bruce R Whiting Journal: Med Phys Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Taoran Cui; Joseph Weiner; Shabbar Danish; Anupama Chundury; Nisha Ohri; Ning Yue; Xiao Wang; Ke Nie Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 5.738