Literature DB >> 16568267

Dose reduction in multidetector CT of the urinary tract. Studies in a phantom model.

E Coppenrath1, T Meindl, P Herzog, R Khalil, U Mueller-Lisse, L Krenn, M Reiser, U G Mueller-Lisse.   

Abstract

A novel ureter phantom was developed for investigations of image quality and dose in CT urography. The ureter phantom consisted of a water box (14 cm x 32 cm x 42 cm) with five parallel plastic tubes (diameter 2.7 mm) filled with different concentrations of contrast media (1.88-30 mg iodine/ml). CT density of the tubes and noise of the surrounding water were determined using two multidetector scanners (Philips MX8000 with four rows, Siemens Sensation 16 with 16 rows) with varying tube current-time product (15-100 mAs per slice), voltage (90 kV, 100 kV, 120 kV), pitch (0.875-1.75), and slice thickness (1 mm, 2 mm, 3.2 mm). Contrast-to-noise ratio as a parameter of image quality was correlated with dose (CTDI) and was compared with image evaluation by two radiologists. The CT densities of different concentrations of contrast media and contrast-to-noise ratio were significantly higher when low voltages (90 kV versus 120 kV, 100 kV versus 120 kV) were applied. Smaller slice thickness (1 mm versus 2 mm) did not change CT density but decreased contrast-to-noise ratio due to increased noise. Contrast phantom studies showed favourable effects of low tube voltage on image quality in the low dose range. This may facilitate substantial dose reduction in CT urography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16568267     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-0138-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  29 in total

Review 1.  Different phases of renal enhancement: role in detecting and characterizing renal masses during helical CT.

Authors:  B I Yuh; R H Cohan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Image quality and dose comparison among screen-film, computed, and CT scanned projection radiography: applications to CT urography.

Authors:  C H McCollough; M R Bruesewitz; T J Vrtiska; B F King; A J LeRoy; J P Quam; R R Hattery
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Decreasing the radiation dose for renal stone CT: a feasibility study of single- and multidetector CT.

Authors:  Audrey L Spielmann; Joan P Heneghan; Lisa J Lee; Terry Yoshizumi; Rendon C Nelson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Improved pelvicalyceal visualization with multidetector computed tomography urography; comparison with helical computed tomography.

Authors:  V Raptopoulos; A McNamara
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  MDCT urography: retrospective determination of optimal delay time after intravenous contrast administration.

Authors:  Thomas Meindl; Eva Coppenrath; Rami Kahlil; Ulrike L Müller-Lisse; Maximilian F Reiser; Ullrich G Müller-Lisse
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Low dose unenhanced helical computerized tomography for the evaluation of acute flank pain.

Authors:  Michael Hamm; Egbert Knopfle; Susanne Wartenberg; Friedhelm Wawroschek; Dorothea Weckermann; Rolf Harzmann
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Comparison of excretory phase, helical computed tomography with intravenous urography in patients with painless haematuria.

Authors:  M E O'Malley; P F Hahn; I C Yoder; G S Gazelle; F J McGovern; P R Mueller
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.350

8.  Patient radiation dose at CT urography and conventional urography.

Authors:  Richard D Nawfel; Philip F Judy; A Robert Schleipman; Stuart G Silverman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Helical CT for nephrolithiasis and ureterolithiasis: comparison of conventional and reduced radiation-dose techniques.

Authors:  Joan P Heneghan; Keith A McGuire; Richard A Leder; David M DeLong; Terry Yoshizumi; Rendon C Nelson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-10-02       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Acute flank pain: comparison of non-contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography.

Authors:  R C Smith; A T Rosenfield; K A Choe; K R Essenmacher; M Verga; M G Glickman; R C Lange
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  14 in total

1.  Current status of low dose multi-detector CT in the urinary tract.

Authors:  Mi Kim Sung; Sarabjeet Singh; Mannudeep K Kalra
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2011-11-28

2.  Delineation of upper urinary tract segments at MDCT urography in patients with extra-urinary mass lesions: retrospective comparison of standard and low-dose protocols for the excretory phase of imaging.

Authors:  Ulrike L Mueller-Lisse; Eva M Coppenrath; Thomas Meindl; Christoph Degenhart; Michael K Scherr; Christian G Stief; Maximilian F Reiser; Ullrich G Mueller-Lisse
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Evaluation of dose exposure in 64-slice CT colonography.

Authors:  O Luz; M Buchgeister; M Klabunde; T Trabold; A F Kopp; C D Claussen; M Heuschmid
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  CT urography: the end of IVU?

Authors:  F Stacul; A Rossi; M A Cova
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  64-Slice CT urography: optimisation of radiation dose.

Authors:  P Martingano; F Stacul; M F Cavallaro; S Cernic; P Bregant; M A Cova
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Effect of various environments and computed tomography scanning parameters on renal volume measurements in vitro: A phantom study.

Authors:  Wangyan Liu; Yinsu Zhu; Lijun Tang; Xiaomei Zhu; Yi Xu; Guanyu Yang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Use of Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction (MBIR) in reduced-dose CT for routine follow-up of patients with malignant lymphoma: dose savings, image quality and phantom study.

Authors:  Edouard Hérin; François Gardavaud; Mélanie Chiaradia; Pauline Beaussart; Philippe Richard; Madeleine Cavet; Jean-François Deux; Corinne Haioun; Emmanuel Itti; Alain Rahmouni; Alain Luciani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) in patients with a history of previous urothelial cancer or painless macroscopic haematuria.

Authors:  Ullrich G Mueller-Lisse; Ulrike L Mueller-Lisse; Josef Hinterberger; Peter Schneede; Thomas Meindl; Maximilian F Reiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  CT urography: definition, indications and techniques. A guideline for clinical practice.

Authors:  Aart J Van Der Molen; Nigel C Cowan; Ullrich G Mueller-Lisse; Claus C A Nolte-Ernsting; Satoru Takahashi; Richard H Cohan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Multidetector CT urography: experimental analysis of radiation dose reduction in an animal model.

Authors:  Joern Kemper; Marc Regier; Paul M Bansmann; Philipp G C Begemann; Alexander Stork; Hans Dieter Nagel; Gerhard Adam; Claus Nolte-Ernsting
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.