Literature DB >> 18671278

The Fusiform Face Area responds automatically to statistical regularities optimal for face categorization.

Roberto Caldara1, Mohamed L Seghier.   

Abstract

Statistical regularities pervade our perceptual world. Assuming that the human brain is tuned for satisfying the constraints of the visual environment, visual system computations should be optimized for processing such regularities. A socially relevant and highly recurrent homogenous pattern for which the brain has developed sensitivity is certainly the human face. Yet, for which statistical regularities the face sensitive regions are tuned for, and to what extent their detection occurs automatically is largely unexplored. Using fMRI we measured activations within the face sensitive areas for nonface symmetrical and asymmetrical curvilinear patterns with either more high-contrast elements in the upper or in the lower part. Faceness evaluation performed outside of the scanner showed that these patterns were not perceived as schematic faces. Noticeably, symmetry violations disrupted perception of faceness, despite objective image similarity measures showing high faceness values for those patterns. Among the faces sensitive regions, only the right Fusiform Face Area (FFA) showed sensitivity to symmetry. This region showed also greater responses to patterns with more elements in the upper part. Critically, the FFA's responses were more strongly correlated with the physical objective faceness properties of the stimuli than the perceived subjective faceness ratings of the observers. These findings provide direct evidence that the neural computations of the right FFA are tuned to curvilinear symmetrical patterns with high-contrasted elements in the upper part, which fit best with the physical structure of human faces. Such low-level geometrical regularities might be used by the FFA to automatically categorize visual shapes as faces. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18671278      PMCID: PMC6870713          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  36 in total

1.  The fusiform "face area" is part of a network that processes faces at the individual level.

Authors:  I Gauthier; M J Tarr; J Moylan; P Skudlarski; J C Gore; A W Anderson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Can a nonspecific bias toward top-heavy patterns explain newborns' face preference?

Authors:  Viola Macchi Cassia; Chiara Turati; Francesca Simion
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-06

3.  The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification.

Authors:  Kalanit Grill-Spector; Nicholas Knouf; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-04-11       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Bubbles: a technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks.

Authors:  F Gosselin; P G Schyns
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Predominantly extra-retinotopic cortical response to pattern symmetry.

Authors:  Christopher W Tyler; Heidi A Baseler; Leonid L Kontsevich; Lora T Likova; Alex R Wade; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-11-26       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain.

Authors:  Pia Rotshtein; Richard N A Henson; Alessandro Treves; Jon Driver; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-12-12       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Norm-based face encoding by single neurons in the monkey inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  David A Leopold; Igor V Bondar; Martin A Giese
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The distributed human neural system for face perception.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: some implications for theories of face recognition.

Authors:  H D Ellis; J W Shepherd; G M Davies
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Symmetry perception: a novel approach for biological shapes.

Authors:  Hugh R Wilson; Frances Wilkinson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  16 in total

1.  Event-related potential and functional MRI measures of face-selectivity are highly correlated: a simultaneous ERP-fMRI investigation.

Authors:  Boaz Sadeh; Ilana Podlipsky; Andrey Zhdanov; Galit Yovel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Cross-hemispheric collaboration and segregation associated with task difficulty as revealed by structural and functional connectivity.

Authors:  Simon W Davis; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Internal representations for face detection: an application of noise-based image classification to BOLD responses.

Authors:  Adrian Nestor; Jean M Vettel; Michael J Tarr
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Detecting symmetry and faces: separating the tasks and identifying their interactions.

Authors:  Rebecca M Jones; Jonathan D Victor; Mary M Conte
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Inversion effects in face-selective cortex with combinations of face parts.

Authors:  Thomas W James; Lindsay R Arcurio; Jason M Gold
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Putting culture under the 'spotlight' reveals universal information use for face recognition.

Authors:  Roberto Caldara; Xinyue Zhou; Sébastien Miellet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Neural correlates associated with superior tactile symmetry perception in the early blind.

Authors:  Corinna Bauer; Lindsay Yazzolino; Gabriella Hirsch; Zaira Cattaneo; Tomaso Vecchi; Lotfi B Merabet
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Face inversion reduces the persistence of global form and its neural correlates.

Authors:  Lars Strother; Pavagada S Mathuranath; Adrian Aldcroft; Cheryl Lavell; Melvyn A Goodale; Tutis Vilis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Decoding of faces and face components in face-sensitive human visual cortex.

Authors:  David F Nichols; Lisa R Betts; Hugh R Wilson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-07-08

10.  Is there a genuine advantage to the upper part of words during lexical access? Evidence from the Stroop task.

Authors:  Pilar Tejero; Manuel Perea; María Jiménez
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.