Literature DB >> 24319342

Enhanced Facial Symmetry Assessment in Orthodontists.

Tate H Jackson1, Kait Clark, Stephen R Mitroff.   

Abstract

Assessing facial symmetry is an evolutionarily important process, which suggests that individual differences in this ability should exist. As existing data are inconclusive, the current study explored whether a group trained in facial symmetry assessment, orthodontists, possessed enhanced abilities. Symmetry assessment was measured using face and non-face stimuli among orthodontic residents and two control groups: university participants with no symmetry training and airport security luggage screeners, a group previously shown to possess expert visual search skills unrelated to facial symmetry. Orthodontic residents were more accurate at assessing symmetry in both upright and inverted faces compared to both control groups, but not for non-face stimuli. These differences are not likely due to motivational biases or a speed-accuracy tradeoff-orthodontic residents were slower than the university participants but not the security screeners. Understanding such individual differences in facial symmetry assessment may inform the perception of facial attractiveness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  face; individual differences; orthodontics; perceptual processing; symmetry

Year:  2013        PMID: 24319342      PMCID: PMC3851030          DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2013.832450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis cogn        ISSN: 1350-6285


  21 in total

1.  Processes underlying the cross-race effect: an investigation of holistic, featural, and relational processing of own-race versus other-race faces.

Authors:  Catherine J Mondloch; Natalie Elms; Daphne Maurer; Gillian Rhodes; William G Hayward; James W Tanaka; Guomei Zhou
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 2.  The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces.

Authors:  Nancy Kanwisher; Galit Yovel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Orientation-contingent face aftereffects and implications for face-coding mechanisms.

Authors:  Gillian Rhodes; Linda Jeffery; Tamara L Watson; Emma Jaquet; Chris Winkler; Colin W G Clifford
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Face configuration processing in the human brain: the role of symmetry.

Authors:  Chien-Chung Chen; Kai-Ling C Kao; Christopher W Tyler
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-08-21       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation.

Authors:  Catherine O Fritz; Peter E Morris; Jennifer J Richler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2011-08-08

6.  Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments.

Authors:  J Kruger; D Dunning
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1999-12

7.  Assessing the influence of asymmeftry affecting the mandible and chin point on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson.

Authors:  Farhad B Naini; Ana Nora A Donaldson; Fraser McDonald; Martyn T Cobourne
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Detecting symmetry and faces: separating the tasks and identifying their interactions.

Authors:  Rebecca M Jones; Jonathan D Victor; Mary M Conte
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Perception of symmetry in the face.

Authors:  Clara E Huisinga-Fischer; Jim P H J A Souren; Frederik v d Werken; Birte Prahl-Andersen; Floris van Ginkel
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.046

10.  Lack of confidence among trainee doctors in the management of diabetes: the Trainees Own Perception of Delivery of Care (TOPDOC) Diabetes Study.

Authors:  J T George; D Warriner; D J McGrane; K S Rozario; H C Price; E G Wilmot; P Kar; I M Stratton; E B Jude; G A McKay
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2011-04-21
View more
  1 in total

1.  Mammography to tomosynthesis: examining the differences between two-dimensional and segmented-three-dimensional visual search.

Authors:  Stephen H Adamo; Justin M Ericson; Joseph C Nah; Rachel Brem; Stephen R Mitroff
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-06-14
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.