Literature DB >> 10615472

Evidence for holistic processing of faces viewed as photographic negatives.

G J Hole1, P A George, V Dunsmore.   

Abstract

Inversion and photographic negation both impair face recognition. Inversion seems to disrupt processing of the spatial relationship between facial features ('relational' processing) which normally occurs with upright faces and which facilitates their recognition. It remains unclear why negation affects recognition. To find out if negation impairs relational processing, we investigated whether negative faces are subject to the 'chimeric-face effect'. Recognition of the top half of a composite face (constructed from top and bottom halves of different faces) is difficult when the face is upright, but not when it is inverted. To perform this task successfully, the bottom half of the face has to be disregarded, but the relational processing which normally occurs with upright faces makes this difficult. Inversion reduces relational processing and thus facilitates performance on this particular task. In our experiments, subjects saw pairs of chimeric faces and had to decide whether or not the top halves were identical. On half the trials the two chimeras had identical tops; on the remaining trials the top halves were different. (The bottom halves were always different.) All permutations of orientation (upright or inverted) and luminance (normal or negative) were used. In experiment 1, each pair of 'identical' top halves were the same in all respects. Experiment 2 used differently oriented views of the same person, to preclude matches being based on incidental features of the images rather than the faces displayed within them. In both experiments, similar chimeric-face effects were obtained with both positive and negative faces, implying that negative faces evoke some form of relational processing. It is argued that there may be more than one kind of relational processing involved in face recognition: the 'chimeric-face effect' may reflect an initial 'holistic' processing which binds facial features into a 'Gestalt', rather than being a demonstration of the configurational processing involved in individual recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10615472     DOI: 10.1068/p2622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  24 in total

1.  Higher-level mechanisms detect facial symmetry.

Authors:  Gillian Rhodes; Marianne Peters; Kieran Lee; M Concetta Morrone; David Burr
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  The early development of face processing--what makes faces special?

Authors:  Stefanie Hoehl; Stefanie Peykarjou
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 5.203

Review 3.  The composite face illusion.

Authors:  Jennifer Murphy; Katie L H Gray; Richard Cook
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

4.  The composite face effect in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Annum A Qureshi; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 2.231

5.  The importance of surface-based cues for face discrimination in non-human primates.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Jessica Taubert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Behavioral and neural evidence of increased attention to the bottom half of the face in deaf signers.

Authors:  Teresa V Mitchell; Susan M Letourneau; Melissa C T Maslin
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.406

7.  Impaired holistic processing in congenital prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Galia Avidan; Michal Tanzer; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Seeing faces as objects: no face inversion effect with geometrical discrimination.

Authors:  Pamela M Pallett; Donald I A MacLeod
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Face and object discrimination in autism, and relationship to IQ and age.

Authors:  Pamela M Pallett; Shereen J Cohen; Karen R Dobkins
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2014-05

10.  Role of fusiform and anterior temporal cortical areas in facial recognition.

Authors:  Shahin Nasr; Roger B H Tootell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.