Literature DB >> 17505846

[Facial aesthetics Part II - effect of symmetric and asymmetric modulations of the orbital region].

Ingo N Springer1, Björn Wannicke, Jörg Wiltfang, Patrick H Warnke, Oliver Zernial, Stefan Wolfart.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of standardised computer-manipulated changes to images of the orbital region. Judges (n=250) ranked each image for attractiveness on a visual-analogue-scale. The images were thereby classified into different clusters according to their ratings of attractiveness. These clusters were highly significantly different (p<0.001). The degree of negative impact of changes to the orbital region on facial attractiveness increased significantly from lateral to medial and from cranial to caudal. Small asymmetrical or symmetrical lateral variations did not influence attractiveness negatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17505846     DOI: 10.1007/s10006-007-0059-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir        ISSN: 1432-9417


  16 in total

1.  Symmetry is in the eye of the beeholder: innate preference for bilateral symmetry in flower-naïve bumblebees.

Authors:  Ivana Rodríguez; Andreas Gumbert; Natalie Hempel de Ibarra; Jan Kunze; Martin Giurfa
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2004-06-17

Review 2.  Evaluation of facial skeletal aesthetics and surgical planning.

Authors:  S P Bartlett; I Wornom; L A Whitaker
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.017

3.  Higher-level mechanisms detect facial symmetry.

Authors:  Gillian Rhodes; Marianne Peters; Kieran Lee; M Concetta Morrone; David Burr
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The face, beauty, and symmetry: perceiving asymmetry in beautiful faces.

Authors:  D W Zaidel; J A Cohen
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.292

5.  Selection of exaggerated male traits by female aesthetic senses.

Authors:  M Enquist; A Arak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-02-04       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Gaze motor asymmetries in the perception of faces during a memory task.

Authors:  I Mertens; H Siegmund; O J Grüsser
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Female preference for symmetrical males as a by-product of selection for mate recognition.

Authors:  R A Johnstone
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-11-10       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Appearance of symmetry, beauty, and health in human faces.

Authors:  Dahlia W Zaidel; Shawn M Aarde; Kiran Baig
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Symmetry, sexual dimorphism in facial proportions and male facial attractiveness.

Authors:  I S Penton-Voak; B C Jones; A C Little; S Baker; B Tiddeman; D M Burt; D I Perrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Symmetry, beauty and evolution.

Authors:  M Enquist; A Arak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-11-10       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.