Literature DB >> 15976422

Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Neil Johnson1, David Barlow, Anne Lethaby, Emma Tavender, Liz Curr, Ray Garry.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the most appropriate surgical method of hysterectomy (abdominal, vaginal, or laparoscopic) for women with benign disease.
DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, Embase, and Biological Abstracts. SELECTION OF STUDIES: Only randomised controlled trials were selected; participants had to have benign gynaecological disease; interventions had to comprise at least one hysterectomy method compared with another; and trials had to report primary outcomes (time taken to return to normal activities, intraoperative visceral injury, and major long term complications) or secondary outcomes (operating time, other immediate complications of surgery, short term complications, and duration of hospital stay).
RESULTS: 27 trials (total of 3643 participants) were included. Return to normal activities was quicker after vaginal than after abdominal hysterectomy (weighted mean difference 9.5 (95% confidence interval 6.4 to 12.6) days) and after laparoscopic than after abdominal hysterectomy (difference 13.6 (11.8 to 15.4) days), but was not significantly different for laparoscopic versus vaginal hysterectomy (difference -1.1 (-4.2 to 2.1) days). There were more urinary tract injuries with laparoscopic than with abdominal hysterectomy (odds ratio 2.61 (95% confidence interval 1.22 to 5.60)), but no other intraoperative visceral injuries showed a significant difference between surgical approaches. Data were notably absent for many important long term patient outcome measures, where the analyses were underpowered to detect important differences, or they were simply not reported in trials.
CONCLUSIONS: Significantly speedier return to normal activities and other improved secondary outcomes (shorter duration of hospital stay and fewer unspecified infections or febrile episodes) suggest that vaginal hysterectomy is preferable to abdominal hysterectomy where possible. Where vaginal hysterectomy is not possible, laparoscopic hysterectomy is preferable to abdominal hysterectomy, although it brings a higher chance of bladder or ureter injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15976422      PMCID: PMC558455          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.330.7506.1478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  39 in total

1.  Hysterectomy techniques used for benign pathologies: results of a French multicentre study.

Authors:  C Chapron; L Laforest; Y Ansquer; A Fauconnier; B Fernandez; G Bréart; J B Dubuisson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a study of 100 cases on light-endorsed transvaginal section.

Authors:  Eing-Mei Tsai; Hung-Sheng Chen; Cheng-Yu Long; Cheng-Hui Yang; Shih-Cheng Hsu; Chin-Hu Wu; Jau-Nan Lee
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy.

Authors:  F Nezhat; C Nezhat; S Gordon; E Wilkins
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 0.142

4.  Comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with conventional abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.

Authors:  J H Phipps; M John; S Nayak
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1993-07

5.  Three methods for hysterectomy: a randomised, prospective study of short term outcome.

Authors:  C Ottosen; G Lingman; L Ottosen
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 6.  Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.

Authors:  N Johnson; D Barlow; A Lethaby; E Tavender; E Curr; R Garry
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-01-25

7.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy.

Authors:  F M Howard; R Sanchez
Journal:  J Gynecol Surg       Date:  1993

8.  [Comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy with abdominal hysterectomy. Technique and results].

Authors:  G Kunz; T Plath; G Leyendecker
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.915

9.  Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study.

Authors:  R Marana; M Busacca; E Zupi; N Garcea; P Paparella; G F Catalano
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  A randomised prospective trial comparing laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy.

Authors:  J H Olsson; M Ellstrom; M Hahlin
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1996-04
View more
  58 in total

1.  Hysterectomy for benign conditions.

Authors:  Leroy C Edozien
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-06-25

2.  Methods of hysterectomy: should women have a say?

Authors:  Vikki A Entwistle; Graeme MacLennan; Zoe Skea; Siladitya Bhattacharya; Brian Williams
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-08-06

3.  Urologic complications of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Jong Ha Hwang; Myong Cheol Lim; Jae Young Joung; Sang-Soo Seo; Sokbom Kang; Ho Kyung Seo; Jinsoo Chung; Sang-Yoon Park
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: 10 steps toward a successful procedure.

Authors:  Jon I Einarsson; Yoko Suzuki
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

5.  Single-port gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Tiffany Jackson; Jon Einarsson
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010

6.  Does size matter? The effect of uterine weight on robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy outcomes.

Authors:  Mona E Orady; A Karim Nawfal; Ganesa Wegienka
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-05-13

7.  Women's preference for laparoscopic or abdominal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Kirsten B Kluivers; Brent C Opmeer; Peggy M Geomini; Marlies Y Bongers; Mark E Vierhout; Gérard L Bremer; Ben W J Mol
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2008-12-16

8.  Comparison of minimally invasive surgical approaches for hysterectomy at a community hospital: robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Bang N Giep; Hoang N Giep; Helen B Hubert
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-08-10

9.  Considering usual medical care in clinical trial design.

Authors:  Liza Dawson; Deborah A Zarin; Ezekiel J Emanuel; Lawrence M Friedman; Bimal Chaudhari; Steven N Goodman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 10.  Perioperative medical management of patients with COPD.

Authors:  Marc Licker; Alexandre Schweizer; Christoph Ellenberger; Jean-Marie Tschopp; John Diaper; François Clergue
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.