Literature DB >> 10527970

Hysterectomy techniques used for benign pathologies: results of a French multicentre study.

C Chapron1, L Laforest, Y Ansquer, A Fauconnier, B Fernandez, G Bréart, J B Dubuisson.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the techniques by which hysterectomies are carried out and to determine the rate of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). A transversal multicentre study was conducted in 23 gynaecology and obstetrics departments of French University Hospital Centres. The study population comprised only those patients for whom hysterectomy was indicated for benign disease without genital prolapse or urinary stress incontinence. Whereas the rates of performance of hysterectomy by laparotomy and by the vaginal route are comparable [respectively 40.0% (94 patients) and 46.8% (110 patients)], the rate of performance of TLH is only 13.2% (31 patients). All 23 centres (100%) carried out hysterectomy by laparotomy and 21 centres (91.3%) carried out vaginal hysterectomy; however, only nine centres (39.1%) carried out TLH. Only seven centres (30.4%) performed all three types of operation. Of the eight centres whose rate of vaginal hysterectomy was >60%, six (75%) did not carry out TLH. The study suggests that the usage of the TLH technique appears to be limited. The extent of surgical training is a major factor in the choice of technique for hysterectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10527970     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.10.2464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  8 in total

1.  Incidence of pelvic floor repair after hysterectomy: A population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Roberta E Blandon; Adil E Bharucha; L Joseph Melton; Cathy D Schleck; Ebenezer O Babalola; Alan R Zinsmeister; John B Gebhart
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Decreasing utilization of hysterectomy: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1965-2002.

Authors:  Ebenezer O Babalola; Adil E Bharucha; Cathy D Schleck; John B Gebhart; Alan R Zinsmeister; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Neil Johnson; David Barlow; Anne Lethaby; Emma Tavender; Liz Curr; Ray Garry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-06-25

4.  Laparoscopic assistance after vaginal hysterectomy and unsuccessful access to the ovaries or failed uterine mobilization: changing trends.

Authors:  Ornella Sizzi; Pierluigi Paparella; Claudio Bonito; Raffaele Paparella; Alfonso Rossetti
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2004 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Preliminary experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic staging of gynecologic malignancies.

Authors:  R Kevin Reynolds; William M Burke; Arnold P Advincula
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Indication for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Mitsuru Shiota; Yasushi Kotani; Masahiko Umemoto; Takako Tobiume; Hiroshi Hoshiai
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 7.  Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.

Authors:  Johanna W M Aarts; Theodoor E Nieboer; Neil Johnson; Emma Tavender; Ray Garry; Ben Willem J Mol; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-12

8.  Ten years of progress--improved hysterectomy outcomes in Finland 1996-2006: a longitudinal observation study.

Authors:  Juha Mäkinen; Tea Brummer; Jyrki Jalkanen; Anna-Mari Heikkinen; Jaana Fraser; Eija Tomás; Päivi Härkki; Jari Sjöberg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.