Literature DB >> 11117766

Three methods for hysterectomy: a randomised, prospective study of short term outcome.

C Ottosen1, G Lingman, L Ottosen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To detect differences in clinical short term outcome between total abdominal hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial.
SETTING: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital of Helsingborg, Sweden. SAMPLE: One hundred-twenty women scheduled for hysterectomy for various indications.
METHODS: Randomisation into three treatment arms: total abdominal hysterectomy (n = 40); vaginal hysterectomy (n = 40) and laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (n = 40). During traditional abdominal and vaginal surgery, laparoscopic assistance was kept to a minimum. Substantial number of cases needed volume-reducing manoeuvres due to uterine size. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Duration of surgery, anaesthesia, time in hospital and recovery time.
RESULTS: Mean duration (range) of surgery was significantly longer for laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with vaginal hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy, 102 min (50-175), 81 min (35-135) and 68 min (28-125), respectively. Mean stay in hospital and mean time to recovery was significantly longer for total abdominal hysterectomy compared with vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy. The difference between vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy was not significant. It was possible to remove uteri under 600 g with all three methods. Four laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomies and one vaginal hysterectomy were converted to open surgery. Reoperation and blood transfusion were required after two vaginal hysterectomies and one laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy. One woman needed blood transfusion after total abdominal hysterectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Traditional vaginal hysterectomy proved to be feasible and the faster operative technique compared with vaginal hysterectomy with laparoscopic assistance. The abdominal technique was somewhat faster, but time spent in theatre was not significantly shorter. Abdominal hysterectomy required on average a longer hospital stay of one day and one additional week of convalescence compared with traditional vaginal hysterectomy. Vaginal hysterectomy should be a primary method for uterine removal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11117766     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11652.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  20 in total

1.  Are perioperative bundles associated with reduced postoperative morbidity in women undergoing benign hysterectomy? Retrospective cohort analysis of 16,286 cases in Michigan.

Authors:  John A Harris; Anne G Sammarco; Carolyn W Swenson; Shitanshu Uppal; Neil Kamdar; Darrel Campbell; Sarah Evilsizer; John O DeLancey; Daniel M Morgan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Abdominal hysterectomy: a new approach for conventional procedure.

Authors:  Dilip Kumar Dutta; Indranil Dutta
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-04-15

3.  Deciding the route for hysterectomy: Indian triage system.

Authors:  Alokananda Ray; Luna Pant; Navneet Magon
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-06-11

4.  Predicting postoperative day 1 hematocrit levels after uncomplicated hysterectomy.

Authors:  Carolyn W Swenson; Michael S Lanham; Daniel M Morgan; Mitchell B Berger
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.561

5.  A Comparison Between Non-Descent Vaginal Hysterectomy and Total Abdominal Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Dhivya Balakrishnan; Gharphalia Dibyajyoti
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-01-01

6.  Small bowel obstruction after vaginal vault suspension: a series of three cases.

Authors:  Beri Ridgeway; Matthew D Barber; Mark D Walters; Marie Fidela R Paraiso
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-03-27

Review 7.  Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Neil Johnson; David Barlow; Anne Lethaby; Emma Tavender; Liz Curr; Ray Garry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-06-25

8.  The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Ray Garry; Jayne Fountain; Su Mason; Jeremy Hawe; Vicky Napp; Jason Abbott; Richard Clayton; Graham Phillips; Mark Whittaker; Richard Lilford; Stephen Bridgman; Julia Brown
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-07

9.  Observational evaluation of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative characteristics in 117 Brazilian women without uterine prolapse undergoing vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Claudio Sergio Batista; Takasi Osako; Eliana Mara Clemente; Fernanda Carvalhido Antonio Batista; Maurício Takeshi Janiques Osako
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2012-09-21

Review 10.  Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.

Authors:  Johanna W M Aarts; Theodoor E Nieboer; Neil Johnson; Emma Tavender; Ray Garry; Ben Willem J Mol; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.