Literature DB >> 27628116

Does size matter? The effect of uterine weight on robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy outcomes.

Mona E Orady1, A Karim Nawfal2, Ganesa Wegienka3.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine whether uterine weight affects the surgical outcomes of robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy (RH) procedures. The design of this study is retrospective cohort study. The classification of the study design is level II-2 evidence. The study setting is the Henry Ford Health System's Community Teaching Hospitals. One-hundred and thirty-five patients underwent RH for benign indications at one of two hospitals between January1, 2008, and June 1, 2010. Interventions were scheduled RH without concomitant uro-gynecologic procedures as the intention to treat. Patient demographics, age, height, weight, estimated blood loss (EBL), procedure duration, uterine weight, pathology, length of hospital stay (LOS), and any complications were obtained from a detailed review of electronic medical records. Uterine weight ranged from 47 to 1,290 g (<250 g, n = 87; 250-500 g, n = 28; >500 g, n = 18). Overall, uterine weight was highly correlated with procedure duration (r = .53, P < .001.). Median procedure duration increased from 150 min for the <250 g group, to 205 min for the 250-500 g group, and to 295 min for the >500 g group. Uterine weight was also moderately correlated with EBL (r = .30, P = .0005). Median EBL increased from 50 ml for uteri <250 g to 87.5 ml for the 250-500 g group, and 100 ml for the >500 g group. This correlation did not persist in the assessment of decrease in peri-operative hemoglobin (r = .09, P = .30). Ninety-one women had a LOS of 1 day (67.4%), 31 women had a LOS of 2 days (23%), and 13 women had a LOS of greater than 2 days (9.6%). Uterine weight was not correlated with LOS (r = .14, P = .10) and was not associated with increased major or minor complications (WRS P = .79) re-admission (WRS P = .35), or blood transfusion (n = 3). RH can be performed on patients with large uteri exceeding 500 g without associated adverse outcomes. Although procedure duration is increased, there is no significant effect on EBL and no increase in the occurrence of complications or length of stay.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DaVinci hysterectomy; Large uterus; Robotic hysterectomy; Uterine fibroids; Uterine weight

Year:  2011        PMID: 27628116     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-011-0271-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  25 in total

Review 1.  Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: indications, techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  Harry Reich
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.927

2.  Robotically assisted hysterectomy: 100 cases after the learning curve.

Authors:  Thomas N Payne; Francis R Dauterive
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-03-18

3.  Robot-assisted gynecological surgery in a community setting.

Authors:  Johann M Piquion-Joseph; Anju Nayar; Armine Ghazaryan; Ramesha Papanna; Waldemar Klimek; Rahul Laroia
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2009-03-07

4.  Total laparoscopic hysterectomy for very enlarged uteri.

Authors:  A Wattiez; D Soriano; A Fiaccavento; M Canis; R Botchorishvili; J Pouly; G Mage; M A Bruhat
Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc       Date:  2002-05

5.  Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: preoperative risk factors for conversion to laparotomy.

Authors:  Franck Leonard; Nicolas Chopin; Bruno Borghese; Adolphe Fotso; Hervé Foulot; Joël Coste; Alexandre Mignon; Charles Chapron
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.137

6.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: technique and initial experience.

Authors:  R Kevin Reynolds; Arnold P Advincula
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Incidence and characteristics of patients with vaginal cuff dehiscence after robotic procedures.

Authors:  Rosanne M Kho; Mohamed N Akl; Jeffrey L Cornella; Paul M Magtibay; Mary Ellen Wechter; Javier F Magrina
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  National Hospital Discharge Survey: 2005 annual summary with detailed diagnosis and procedure data.

Authors:  Carol J DeFrances; Karen A Cullen; Lola Jean Kozak
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 13       Date:  2007-12

9.  Perioperative outcomes of robotically assisted hysterectomy for benign cases with complex pathology.

Authors:  John F Boggess; Paola A Gehrig; Leigh Cantrell; Aaron Shafer; Alberto Mendivil; Emma Rossi; Rabbie Hanna
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?

Authors:  John P Lenihan; Carol Kovanda; Usha Seshadri-Kreaden
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.137

View more
  4 in total

1.  Using the "Summa Set-up" in robotic assisted gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Thomas J Mendise; Edward M Ferris; Michele L McCarroll; Vivian E von Gruenigen
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-11-08

2.  Robotic Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: What Have We Learned from a Decade?

Authors:  Marie Carbonnel; Gaby N Moawad; Mia Maria Tarazi; Aurelie Revaux; Titouan Kennel; Angéline Favre-Inhofer; Jean Marc Ayoubi
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

3.  Comparison of robotic-assisted hysterectomy to other minimally invasive approaches.

Authors:  Mona Orady; Alexander Hrynewych; A Karim Nawfal; Ganesa Wegienka
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy; comparison of early surgical outcomes

Authors:  Özgüç Takmaz; Mete Güngör
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2020-06-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.