Literature DB >> 1532990

Laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy.

F Nezhat1, C Nezhat, S Gordon, E Wilkins.   

Abstract

The perioperative and postoperative courses of hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were compared for 10 women who underwent total abdominal hysterectomy and 10 who underwent laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Although laparoscopic hysterectomy took longer (160 versus 102 minutes), the women undergoing it had a shorter duration of hospitalization (2.4 versus 4.4 days), more rapid recuperation (3 versus 5 weeks) and fewer complications. These preliminary results suggest that in the hands of experienced operative laparoscopists, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy is preferable to abdominal hysterectomy for selected candidates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1532990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reprod Med        ISSN: 0024-7758            Impact factor:   0.142


  19 in total

1.  New closure technique for lateral operative laparoscopic trocar sites. A report of 80 closures.

Authors:  N H Stringer; E S Levy; M P Kezmoh; J Walker; S Abramovitz; D L Sadowski; Y Keflemariam
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic repair of small bowel and colon. A report of 26 cases.

Authors:  C Nezhat; F Nezhat; W Ambroze; E Pennington
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopically-assisted hysterectomy.

Authors:  W A Saleh; C Nezhat
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1994-08

Review 4.  Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Neil Johnson; David Barlow; Anne Lethaby; Emma Tavender; Liz Curr; Ray Garry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-06-25

5.  Minilaparotomically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Yu-Duk Choi; Soon-Pyo Lee; Young-Won Cha; Jang Yeul Choi
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 6.  Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  D Korolija; S Sauerland; S Wood-Dauphinée; C C Abbou; E Eypasch; M García Caballero; M A Lumsden; B Millat; J R T Monson; G Nilsson; R Pointner; W Schwenk; A Shamiyeh; A Szold; E Targarona; B Ure; E Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Ray Garry; Jayne Fountain; Su Mason; Jeremy Hawe; Vicky Napp; Jason Abbott; Richard Clayton; Graham Phillips; Mark Whittaker; Richard Lilford; Stephen Bridgman; Julia Brown
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-07

Review 8.  [Uterine myoma: modalities and indications for coelioscopic treatment].

Authors:  C Chapron; J B Dubuisson; X Chavet; V Aubert; P Morice; F X Aubriot; H Foulot
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.344

9.  Total laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uterus.

Authors:  Rakesh Sinha; Meenakshi Sundaram; Smita Lakhotia; Chaitali Mahajan; Gayatri Manaktala; Parul Shah
Journal:  J Gynecol Endosc Surg       Date:  2009-01

10.  A novel technique of total laparoscopic hysterectomy for routine use: evaluation of 140 cases.

Authors:  S P Puntambekar; G N Wagh; S S Puntambekar; R M Sathe; M A Kulkarni; M A Kashyap; A M Patil; Meinhold-Heerlein Ivo
Journal:  Int J Biomed Sci       Date:  2008-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.