Literature DB >> 12771457

Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a study of 100 cases on light-endorsed transvaginal section.

Eing-Mei Tsai1, Hung-Sheng Chen, Cheng-Yu Long, Cheng-Hui Yang, Shih-Cheng Hsu, Chin-Hu Wu, Jau-Nan Lee.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the results of a modified laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) procedure, using light-endorsed transvaginal section by two puncture trocars, with those of total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) in a prospective, randomized, short-term study. A new, modified LAVH technique using Endo GIA stapler and two puncture trocars was established. For the laparoscopic phase, each adnexum was dissected, and the vesicouterine junction was identified clearly with the laparoscopic light from the vaginal side. Vaginal-phase surgery was performed as usual. Two hundred patients scheduled for abdominal hysterectomy were randomized to either LAVH (n = 100) or TAH (n = 100). Duration of hospitalization, time of surgery, dose of analgesics, and rates of complications were significantly lower in the LAVH group (p < 0.001). The average operating time was 77 +/- 30 min for LAVH and 102 +/- 18 min for TAH. The duration of hospitalization was 3.2 +/- 0.7 days for LAVH and 5.5 +/- 1.3 days for TAH. There were three complications in the LAVH group and 15 in the TAH group. Postoperative meperidine requirements (1.2 vs. 3.7 ampoules, 1 ampoule = 50 mg) were significantly fewer in the LAVH group. Regarding the training time, the mean operating time in the first 20 cases was 98 min, and in the last 20 cases it was 70.9 min. As compared with TAH and other modified LAVH procedures reported previously, the present technique is easy to learn and timesaving with fewer complications. Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12771457     DOI: 10.1159/000070182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest        ISSN: 0378-7346            Impact factor:   2.031


  4 in total

Review 1.  Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Neil Johnson; David Barlow; Anne Lethaby; Emma Tavender; Liz Curr; Ray Garry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-06-25

2.  Learning Curve Analysis of Different Stages of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Feng-Hsiang Tang; Eing-Mei Tsai
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.

Authors:  Johanna W M Aarts; Theodoor E Nieboer; Neil Johnson; Emma Tavender; Ray Garry; Ben Willem J Mol; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-12

4.  Converting potential abdominal hysterectomy to vaginal one: laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Jyothi Shetty; Asha Shanbhag; Deeksha Pandey
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2014-03-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.