Literature DB >> 26233027

Amplitude modulation reduces loudness adaptation to high-frequency tones.

Dwight P Wynne1, Sahara E George1, Fan-Gang Zeng1.   

Abstract

Long-term loudness perception of a sound has been presumed to depend on the spatial distribution of activated auditory nerve fibers as well as their temporal firing pattern. The relative contributions of those two factors were investigated by measuring loudness adaptation to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated 12-kHz tones. The tones had a total duration of 180 s and were either unmodulated or 100%-modulated at one of three frequencies (4, 20, or 100 Hz), and additionally varied in modulation depth from 0% to 100% at the 4-Hz frequency only. Every 30 s, normal-hearing subjects estimated the loudness of one of the stimuli played at 15 dB above threshold in random order. Without any amplitude modulation, the loudness of the unmodulated tone after 180 s was only 20% of the loudness at the onset of the stimulus. Amplitude modulation systematically reduced the amount of loudness adaptation, with the 100%-modulated stimuli, regardless of modulation frequency, maintaining on average 55%-80% of the loudness at onset after 180 s. Because the present low-frequency amplitude modulation produced minimal changes in long-term spectral cues affecting the spatial distribution of excitation produced by a 12-kHz pure tone, the present result indicates that neural synchronization is critical to maintaining loudness perception over time.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26233027      PMCID: PMC4506306          DOI: 10.1121/1.4922707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  31 in total

1.  Tone decay for hearing-impaired listeners with and without dead regions in the cochlea.

Authors:  Martina Huss; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory nerve spatial encoding of high-frequency pure tones: population response profiles derived from d' measure associated with nearby places along the cochlea.

Authors:  D O Kim; K Parham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Phase locking of auditory-nerve fibers to the envelopes of high-frequency sounds: implications for sound localization.

Authors:  Anna Dreyer; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants.

Authors:  R V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A population study of cochlear nerve fibers: comparison of spatial distributions of average-rate and phase-locking measures of responses to single tones.

Authors:  D O Kim; C E Molnar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Long-term adaptation in cat auditory-nerve fiber responses.

Authors:  E Javel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber.

Authors:  M C Liberman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The auditory sensitivity is increased in tinnitus ears.

Authors:  Sylvie Hébert; Philippe Fournier; Arnaud Noreña
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Loudness adaptation accompanying ribbon synapse and auditory nerve disorders.

Authors:  Dwight P Wynne; Fan-Gang Zeng; Shrutee Bhatt; Henry J Michalewski; Andrew Dimitrijevic; Arnold Starr
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 13.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.