Literature DB >> 15960690

Commentary--surgical decisions after breast cancer: can patients be too involved in decision making?

Nananda F Col1, Christine Duffy, Carol Landau.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2005        PMID： 15960690      PMCID： PMC1361167          DOI： 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00384.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN： 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


× No keyword cloud information.
  49 in total

1.  Psychosocial outcomes of breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  A Moyer
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.267

2.  Mastectomy versus breast-conserving therapy in the treatment of stage I and II carcinoma of the breast: a randomized trial at the National Cancer Institute.

Authors:  A S Lichter; M E Lippman; D N Danforth; T d'Angelo; S M Steinberg; E deMoss; H D MacDonald; C M Reichert; M Merino; S M Swain
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Patient participation in deciding breast cancer treatment and subsequent quality of life.

Authors:  R L Street; B Voigt
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1997 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  L F Degner; L J Kristjanson; D Bowman; J A Sloan; K C Carriere; J O'Neil; B Bilodeau; P Watson; B Mueller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making?

Authors:  R B Deber; N Kraetschmer; J Irvine
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1996-07-08

6.  Breast-conserving therapy vs mastectomy in early-stage breast cancer: a meta-analysis of 10-year survival.

Authors:  A D Morris; R D Morris; J F Wilson; J White; S Steinberg; P Okunieff; R Arriagada; M G Lê; M Blichert-Toft; J A van Dongen
Journal:  Cancer J Sci Am       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb

7.  Patient, hospital, and surgeon factors associated with breast conservation surgery. A statewide analysis in North Carolina.

Authors:  C A Kotwall; D L Covington; R Rutledge; M P Churchill; A A Meyer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Patients' preferences for participation in clinical decision making: a review of published surveys.

Authors:  J Benbassat; D Pilpel; M Tidhar
Journal:  Behav Med       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.104

9.  Quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients treated with radical mastectomy or breast-conserving procedures: results of EORTC Trial 10801. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Breast Cancer Co-operative Group (BCCG).

Authors:  D Curran; J P van Dongen; N K Aaronson; G Kiebert; I S Fentiman; F Mignolet; H Bartelink
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 10.  Controversy in breast reconstruction.

Authors:  C J Corral; T A Mustoe
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.741
View more
  1 in total

1.  Capsule commentary on Livaudais, et al., breast cancer treatment decision-making: are we asking too much of patients?

Authors:  Susan George
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.128
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.