Literature DB >> 8857847

Patient, hospital, and surgeon factors associated with breast conservation surgery. A statewide analysis in North Carolina.

C A Kotwall1, D L Covington, R Rutledge, M P Churchill, A A Meyer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the trend of breast conservation surgery (BCS) in North Carolina over a 6-year period and to identify patient, hospital, and surgeon factors associated with the use of BCS. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Despite evidence that BCS is an appropriate method of treatment for early stage breast cancer, surgeons in the United States have been slow to adopt this treatment method.
METHODS: Cases of primary breast cancer surgery in all 157 hospitals in the state from 1988 to 1993, inclusive (N = 20,760), were obtained from the State Medical Database Commission, Area Resource File, American Hospital Association and State Board of Medical Examiner's Databases. Multiple logistic regression was used to generate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to determine factors associated with BCS.
RESULTS: The rate of BCS doubled from 7.3% in 1988 to 14.3% in 1993, with an overall rate of 10.2% (2117/ 20.760). Multiple logistic regression identified the following factors associated with BCS: patient age younger than 50 years of age (OR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.4, 2.1), patient age 50 to 69 years of age (OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.1, 1.4), private insurance (OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.0, 1.4), hospital bed size 401+(OR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.6, 2.5), bed size 101 to 400 (OR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.3, 2.1), and surgeon graduation from medical school since 1981 (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.2, 2.0).
CONCLUSIONS: Rates of BCS in North Carolina are low. Least likely to have BCS were women older than 70 years of age, without private insurance, treated at small hospitals by older surgeons. To increase the use of BCS, widespread education of surgeons, other health care providers, policy makers, and the general public is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8857847      PMCID: PMC1235398          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199610000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  26 in total

1.  Regional differences in surgical management of breast cancer.

Authors:  R T Osteen; G D Steele; H R Menck; D P Winchester
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Who still prefers aggressive surgery for breast cancer? Implications for the clinical applications of clinical trials.

Authors:  R B Deber; G G Thompson
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1987-09

3.  Underutilization of breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy among women with stage I or II breast cancer.

Authors:  D A Lazovich; E White; D B Thomas; R E Moe
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-12-25       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Trends in conserving treatment of invasive carcinoma of the breast in females.

Authors:  G M Swanson; E R Satariano; W A Satariano; J R Osuch
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1990-12

5.  Geographic variation in the treatment of localized breast cancer.

Authors:  D C Farrow; W C Hunt; J M Samet
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-04-23       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Clinicopathologic factors and patient perceptions associated with surgical breast-conserving treatment.

Authors:  C A Kotwall; J G Maxwell; D L Covington; P Churchill; S E Smith; E K Covan
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  The role of attitudes, beliefs, and personal characteristics of Italian physicians in the surgical treatment of early breast cancer.

Authors:  A Liberati; G Apolone; A Nicolucci; C Confalonieri; R Fossati; R Grilli; V Torri; P Mosconi; A Alexanian
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Nonclinical factors associated with surgery received for treatment of early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  E R Satariano; G M Swanson; P P Moll
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Physician-patient communication about breast cancer. A challenge for the 1990s.

Authors:  W S Schain
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Determinants of physicians' preferences for alternative treatments in women with early breast cancer.

Authors:  A Liberati; W B Patterson; L Biener; B J McNeil
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  1987-12-31
View more
  21 in total

1.  Increasing trends in the use of breast-conserving surgery in California.

Authors:  C R Morris; R Cohen; R Schlag; W E Wright
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Commentary--surgical decisions after breast cancer: can patients be too involved in decision making?

Authors:  Nananda F Col; Christine Duffy; Carol Landau
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Breast cancer outcomes among older women: HMO, fee-for-service, and delivery system comparisons.

Authors:  A Lee-Feldstein; P J Feldstein; T Buchmueller; G Katterhagen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Usefulness of intraoperative touch smear cytology in breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Sumiyoshi; Takehiro Nohara; Mitsuhiko Iwamoto; Satoru Tanaka; Kosei Kimura; Yuko Takahashi; Yoshitaka Kurisu; Motomu Tsuji; Nobuhiko Tanigawa
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Inflammatory and non-inflammatory breast cancer survival by socioeconomic position in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, 1990-2008.

Authors:  Jennifer A Schlichting; Amr S Soliman; Catherine Schairer; David Schottenfeld; Sofia D Merajver
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Significant increase in breast conservation in 16 years of trials conducted by the Austrian Breast & Colorectal Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  Raimund Jakesz; Hellmut Samonigg; Michael Gnant; Ernst Kubista; Dieter Depisch; Roland Kolb; Brigitte Mlineritsch; Hans-Jörg Mischinger; Rainer-Christian Menzel; Peter Steindorfer; Werner Kwasny; Christoph Tausch; Michael Stierer; Susanne Taucher; Michael Seifert; Hubert Hausmaninger
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Moving toward appropriateness of breast cancer care: a balanced act to redefine the scope of standard of care.

Authors:  Shahla Masood
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2016-02-22

8.  Correct information to patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery: the medicolegal significance.

Authors:  A Sanguinetti; A Polistena; R Luchini; M Monacelli; S Avenia; S Galasse; R Cirocchi; N Avenia
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr

9.  Medicare breast surgery fees and treatment received by older women with localized breast cancer.

Authors:  Jack Hadley; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Jean M Mitchell; Jane C Weeks; Edward Guadagnoli; Yi-Ting Hwang
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Certification of breast centres in Germany: proof of concept for a prototypical example of quality assurance in multidisciplinary cancer care.

Authors:  Sara Y Brucker; Michael Bamberg; Walter Jonat; Matthias W Beckmann; Andreas Kämmerle; Rolf Kreienberg; Diethelm Wallwiener
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.