Literature DB >> 9219190

Patient participation in deciding breast cancer treatment and subsequent quality of life.

R L Street1, B Voigt.   

Abstract

This investigation of patients with early breast cancer examined relationships among patient involvement in deciding treatment (i.e., whether to undergo breast removal or breast conservation), perceptions of control over treatment decisions, and subsequent health-related quality of life. It was predicted 1) that patients who more actively participated in consultations to decide treatment would perceive more decision control than would more passive patients and 2) that patients who perceived greater decision control would report better health-related quality of life following treatment than would patients perceiving less decision control. Sixty patients with stage I or II breast cancer allowed their consultations with surgeons to be audiorecorded. Following these visits, patients reported on their involvement in the consultation, optimism for the future, knowledge about treatment, and two aspects of perceived decision control, the perception of having a choice for treatment and the extent to which the doctor or patient was responsible for the decision. Six and 12 months postoperatively, 51 patients (85%) returned a follow-up survey assessing perceived decision control and health-related quality of life. The first prediction received some support. The patients who had more actively participated in their consultations, particularly in terms of offering opinions, assumed more responsibility for treatment decisions during the year following surgery than did less expressive patients. Also, the patients who reported more involvement in their consultations later believed they had had more of a choice for treatment. The second hypothesis was partially supported. Six and 12 months following treatment, the patients who believed they were more responsible for treatment decisions and believed they had more choice of treatment reported higher levels of quality of life than did the patients who perceived themselves to have less decision control. However, perceived control at the time of treatment did not predict later quality of life. Theoretical and clinical implications are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9219190     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9701700306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  73 in total

1.  Is mastectomy overused? A call for an expanded research agenda.

Authors:  Paula V Lantz; Judith K Zemencuk; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Oncology residents' perspectives on communication skills and shared decision making.

Authors:  Rajiv Samant; Inge Aivas; Jean-Marc Bourque; Tara Tucker
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Breast reconstruction and psychosocial adjustment: what have we learned and where do we go from here?

Authors:  Patricia A Parker
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 4.  Biologic agents for IBD: practical insights.

Authors:  Silvio Danese; Lucine Vuitton; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 46.802

5.  Multiple predictors of health-related quality of life in early stage breast cancer. Data from a year follow-up study compared with the general population.

Authors:  Inger Schou; Øivind Ekeberg; Leif Sandvik; Marianne J Hjermstad; Cornelia M Ruland
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Commentary--surgical decisions after breast cancer: can patients be too involved in decision making?

Authors:  Nananda F Col; Christine Duffy; Carol Landau
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Satisfaction with surgery outcomes and the decision process in a population-based sample of women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Paula M Lantz; Nancy K Janz; Angela Fagerlin; Kendra Schwartz; Lihua Liu; Indu Lakhani; Barbara Salem; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Communication and decision making in cancer care: setting research priorities for decision support/patients' decision aids.

Authors:  Amber E Barnato; Hilary A Llewellyn-Thomas; Ellen M Peters; Laura Siminoff; E Dale Collins; Michael J Barry
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Impact of physician-patient discussions on patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Judy Y Chen; May L Tao; Diana Tisnado; Jennifer Malin; Clifford Ko; Martha Timmer; John L Adams; Patricia A Ganz; Katherine L Kahn
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Exome sequencing disclosures in pediatric cancer care: Patterns of communication among oncologists, genetic counselors, and parents.

Authors:  Sarah Scollon; Mary A Majumder; Katie Bergstrom; Tao Wang; Amy L McGuire; Jill O Robinson; Amanda M Gutierrez; Caroline H Lee; Susan G Hilsenbeck; Sharon E Plon; D Williams Parsons; Richard L Street
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-11-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.