Literature DB >> 9640214

Quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients treated with radical mastectomy or breast-conserving procedures: results of EORTC Trial 10801. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Breast Cancer Co-operative Group (BCCG).

D Curran1, J P van Dongen, N K Aaronson, G Kiebert, I S Fentiman, F Mignolet, H Bartelink.   

Abstract

In 1980 the EORTC-BCCG initiated a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing modified radical mastectomy (MRM) with breast-conserving therapy (BCT) in stage I and II breast cancer. The main endpoint of the trial was survival. A brief quality of life (QoL) questionnaire consisting of two multi-item scales (body image and fear of recurrence) and two single items (satisfaction with treatment and cosmetic result) was included in the trial. A cosmetic evaluation of the breast after conservative surgery was also performed. This report concentrates on the results of the QoL study and the cosmetic evaluation. Multitrait scaling analysis was employed to verify the hypothesised scale structure of the questionnaire. Treatment comparison of the QoL scores at 2 years post-treatment was performed using a stratified Wilcoxon rank sum test. Both patients' and doctors' ratings of the cosmetic result were documented on the clinical follow-up form. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify which factors influenced the cosmetic outcome. In total, 127 patients in the MRM arm and 151 in the BCT arm completed a QoL questionnaire at approximately 2 years after randomisation (months 25-36). The Cronbach's alpha coefficients were 0.79 and 0.73 for the body image and fear of recurrence scales, respectively. Significant benefit in body image and satisfaction with treatment was observed in the BCT patients. No significant difference was observed in fear of recurrence between the two groups. Ratings of cosmetic results decreased with time, in line with clinical observations of long-term side-effects of radiotherapy. Wide excision appeared to be the most important predictive factor for poor cosmetic result. In this multicentre randomised study, BCT helped to maintain the patients' body image, resulted in higher satisfaction with treatment and yielded no significant difference from MRM with respect to fear of recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9640214     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00312-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  76 in total

1.  Multiple predictors of health-related quality of life in early stage breast cancer. Data from a year follow-up study compared with the general population.

Authors:  Inger Schou; Øivind Ekeberg; Leif Sandvik; Marianne J Hjermstad; Cornelia M Ruland
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Commentary--surgical decisions after breast cancer: can patients be too involved in decision making?

Authors:  Nananda F Col; Christine Duffy; Carol Landau
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Quality of life assessment in surgical oncology trials.

Authors:  Kerry Avery; Jane M Blazeby
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Early stage breast cancer treatments for younger Medicare beneficiaries with different disabilities.

Authors:  Lisa I Iezzoni; Long H Ngo; Donglin Li; Richard G Roetzheim; Reed E Drews; Ellen P McCarthy
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  Partial breast irradiation: a review of techniques and indications.

Authors:  A J Stewart; A J Khan; P M Devlin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Mammoplasty for symmetry in breast reconstruction and histologic assessment.

Authors:  Apollinaire Gninlgninrin Horo; Olivier Acker; Etienne Roussel; Henri Marret; Gilles Body
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Impact of radiotherapy on the quality of life of elderly patients with localized breast cancer. A prospective study.

Authors:  Juan Ignacio Arraras; Ana Manterola; Miguel Angel Domínguez; Fernando Arias; Elena Villafranca; Pilar Romero; Enrique Martínez; José Juan Illarramendi; Esteban Salgado
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  Oncologic and Cosmetic Outcomes of Oncoplastic Breast Surgery in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Experience from a Developing Country.

Authors:  Mina M G Youssef; Alfred Namour; Omar Z Youssef; Ahmed Morsi
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-08-15

9.  Body image disturbance and surgical decision making in egyptian post menopausal breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Ashraf M Shoma; Madiha H Mohamed; Nashaat Nouman; Mahmoud Amin; Ibtihal M Ibrahim; Salwa S Tobar; Hanan E Gaffar; Warda F Aboelez; Salwa E Ali; Soheir G William
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Quality of life after breast cancer surgery with or without reconstruction.

Authors:  Demetris Stavrou; Oren Weissman; Anna Polyniki; Neofytos Papageorgiou; Joseph Haik; Nimrod Farber; Eyal Winkler
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2009-06-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.